[no subject]

Timmons
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFF3dsxPps6tU0vhXERAuecAKCgdsmeP4uDXIIfp93sPCXapaNvVACgpV56
na8+3mHfSTTOv32KdooWzs4=3D
=3DyVsC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg





f.org Thu Feb 22 13:24:26 2007
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HKIbt-0000Lh-Up; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:24:05 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HKIbs-0000JG-Ke
	for bmwg at ietf.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:24:04 -0500
Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70]
	helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HKIZ6-0005NU-BI
	for bmwg at ietf.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:21:13 -0500
Received: from sj-dkim-6.cisco.com ([171.68.10.81])
	by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Feb 2007 10:21:12 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.14,207,1170662400"; 
	d="scan'208"; a="764104538:sNHT54836608"
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (sj-core-4.cisco.com [171.68.223.138])
	by sj-dkim-6.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l1MILBXU020175; 
	Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:21:11 -0800
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com
	[64.102.31.12])
	by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l1MIKenb019253;
	Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:21:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xmb-rtp-213.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.112]) by
	xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 
	Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:20:23 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [bmwg] WGLC on IPv6 Benchmarking
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:20:22 -0500
Message-ID: <3D1C81E7AA3CD64FA20B04D269FEF7F402D88EEF at xmb-rtp-213.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <45DDDB32.6030902 at monkeyplayground.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [bmwg] WGLC on IPv6 Benchmarking
Thread-Index: AcdWrDc0o/Tsq7pGT1qVdt15q1J2GwAASd9w
References: <200702210346.l1L3kaSP015669 at attrh8i.attrh.att.com>
	<45DDDB32.6030902 at monkeyplayground.net>
From: "Chip Popoviciu \(cpopovic\)" <cpopovic at cisco.com>
To: "Timmons C. Player" <timmons at monkeyplayground.net>, <bmwg at ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Feb 2007 18:20:23.0590 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[1E4B5460:01C756AE]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1210; t=1172168471;
	x=1173032471; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim6002;
	h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
	d=cisco.com; i=cpopovic at cisco.com;
	z=From:=20=22Chip=20Popoviciu=20\(cpopovic\)=22=20<cpopovic at cisco.com>
	|Subject:=20RE=3A=20[bmwg]=20WGLC=20on=20IPv6=20Benchmarking
	|Sender:=20; bh=xEwe/muej+SjNhPJlymrzqdBCC/eooKsW7EFgWGXJSo=;
	b=pgT6b/iki5+xiwjFbExVKDBdEzN+3BYkQwfKdlLYjj8ywB00mHBzeVHzE1RUBWDaKsVzxw3K
	G50+Ac4MZBsPk8Ya0doG06VDghVj/egXfwHRmerss7wjzElLT+gcZmh7;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-6; header.From=cpopovic at cisco.com; dkim=pass (
	sig from cisco.com/sjdkim6002 verified; ); 
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7baded97d9887f7a0c7e8a33c2e3ea1b
Cc: 
X-BeenThere: bmwg at ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>,
	<mailto:bmwg-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg at ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>,
	<mailto:bmwg-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bmwg-bounces at ietf.org


Thank you Timmons for your review and comments. It would be no problem
to include the smaller frame size since this is done in the Annex as a
reference.

Best Regards,
Chip =20

-----Original Message-----
From: Timmons C. Player [mailto:timmons at monkeyplayground.net]=20
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 1:05 PM
To: bmwg at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bmwg] WGLC on IPv6 Benchmarking

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I have a couple questions/comments.

1.  I'm glad to see the back-to-back test being deprecated.  I've always
thought that it was mostly useless for modern DUT's.

2.  Why is 64 bytes used as the minimum frame size for SONET?  I
understand that 64 is the minimum for Ethernet, but the minimum for
SONET is either 46 or 48 (40 byte packets), so it seems like that should
be included in the recommended frame size list...

Timmons
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFF3dsxPps6tU0vhXERAuecAKCgdsmeP4uDXIIfp93sPCXapaNvVACgpV56
na8+3mHfSTTOv32KdooWzs4=3D
=3DyVsC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg