Re: [bmwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane drafts

["Kris Michielsen" <kmichiel at cisco.com>]

Al, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bmwg-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:bmwg-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Al Morton
> Sent: 15 July 2009 21:48
> To: bmwg at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [bmwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane drafts
> 
> Comments on meth-18, all nits,
> Al (mostly as participant)
> 
> At 01:44 PM 7/14/2009, Al Morton wrote:
> >...This message begins a Last call on the IGP-Dataplane Convergence 
> >Time Benchmarking drafts.
> >
> >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-term-18
> >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-18
> >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-app-17
> >
> >The Last Call will end on July 31, 2009.
> 
> 
> Section 4, top of page 10,
> s/At least one condition need to /At least one condition needs to /
> 
> 
> 5.7.  Measurement Accuracy
> ...  When packet jitter is much less than the convergence
>     time, it is a negligible source of error and therefor it 
> will be s/therefor/therefore/
> 
> 5.9 Tester Capabilities
> Add "Also see section 6 for method-specific capabilities."

Corrected all the above.

> 6.1.3.  Measurement Accuracy
> 
>     TBD
> (can't leave this TBD, if there's no obvious material, delete 
> section ?)

Oops, I had put it in as a placeholder. I will think about it some more.

> 
> 
> Section 7, Reporting Format
> 
>          Maximum Packet Delay Threshold      seconds
> this is called "Forwarding Delay Threshold" in the term doc, right?
> pick one for both...

I'll stick to Forwarding Delay Threshold.
 
> Section 9, same as terms, use the standard BMWG paragraphs...

OK

Many thanks!
Kris

> 
> 
>     
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>