Re: [bmwg] comments on draft-novak-bmwg-ipflow-meth-04

["Jan Novak (janovak)" <janovak at cisco.com>]

Hi Al,

Thanks a lot for your review comments - most of them seem easy
to address, just two/three need some more thinking/discussion:

1) bidir traffic - it somehow naturally evolved from the way
   flow monitoring is used/tested - what would be your advice
   regarding that please ?? restrict it for only flow monitoring tests
   or drop it at all ??
  
2) cache overflow - there are few controversial points in the
   two cache modes tests - one of which you picked up by your
   comment :-) - (which gradually surfaced during some
   discussions about HW platform testing and testing of the
   normal cache mode) - recently the idea here actually was to simplify
   the whole thing and specify just one set of tests without 
   distinguishing the two modes - in principle all what needs to
   be seen is Flow Export data and when the DUT starts to lose
   some Flow records and not the internals under which loses happen
.....

3) your general comment - yes thanks - also realised later that section
   6 needs to reflect more of the discussion in section 3 and 
   the Stockholm meeting

Tx, Jan 

The climate of Edinburgh is such that the weak
succumb young .... and the strong envy them.

                                 Dr. Johnson  


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Al Morton [mailto:acmorton at att.com]
> Sent: 25 October 2009 21:18
> To: Jan Novak (janovak); bmwg at ietf.org; Benoit Claise (bclaise)
> Subject: Re: comments on draft-novak-bmwg-ipflow-meth-04
> 
> At 05:39 PM 10/23/2009, Al Morton wrote:
> >Hi Jan and Benoit,
> >
> >I have a few comments and suggestions on your draft, below.
> >
> >Al (as a participant)
> >