Re: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vl anid-tc-mib-00.tx t

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>]

Hi -

> From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
> To: "'Juergen Schoenwaelder'" <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>; "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
> Cc: <bridge-mib@ietf.org>
> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 3:03 PM
> Subject: RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vl anid-tc-mib-00.tx t
...
>        SYNTAX            Integer32 (0 | 1..4094)
>
> And then possibly do away with the VlanIdentifierOrAny?
...

This works as long as one doesn't need to be able to represent
both "none" and "any" as well as the specific VLAN numbers.
The only context I can think of where one might need both
distinct semantics would be in configuring policy-like things.

Randy



_______________________________________________
Bridge-mib mailing list
Bridge-mib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib