The changes in this version of the PS/AS draft primarily respond to Steve Kent's IETF last call comments. Due to the extensive nature of the changes, I believe the WG chairs plan to hold another WG Last Call. On behalf of the draft authors, I apologize for the delay in producing this draft revision. Thanks, --David ---------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 black_david at emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 ---------------------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: i-d-announce-bounces at ietf.org > [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Internet-Drafts at ietf.org > Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 7:30 PM > To: i-d-announce at ietf.org > Cc: anonsec at postel.org > Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-applic-07.txt > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Better-Than-Nothing Security > Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Problem and Applicability Statement > for Better Than Nothing Security (BTNS) > Author(s) : J. Touch, D. Black, Y. Wang > Filename : draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-applic-07.txt > Pages : 30 > Date : 2008-7-8 > > The Internet network security protocol suite, IPsec, requires > authentication, usually of network layer entities, to enable access > control and provide security services. This authentication can be > based on mechanisms such as pre-shared symmetric keys, certificates > with associated asymmetric keys, or the use of Kerberos (via KINK). > The need to deploy authentication information and its associated > identities can be a significant obstacle to the use of IPsec. > > This document explains the rationale for extending the Internet > network security protocol suite to enable use of IPsec security > services without authentication. These extensions are intended to > protect communication, providing "better than nothing security" > (BTNS). The extensions may be used on their own (this use called > Stand Alone BTNS, or SAB), or may be used to provide network layer > security that can be authenticated by higher layers in the protocol > stack (this use is called Channel-Bound BTNS, or CBB). The document > also explains situations for which use of SAB and/or CBB extensions > are applicable. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-applic-07.t xt > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the > Internet-Draft. > _______________________________________________ btns mailing list btns at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.