> -----Original Message----- > From: Nicolas Williams [mailto:Nicolas.Williams at sun.com] > Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 3:14 PM > To: Laganier, Julien > Cc: btns at ietf.org > Subject: Re: [btns] Minor connection-latch problem in AUTH48 > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 02:59:31PM -0700, Laganier, Julien wrote: > > Nicolas Williams wrote: > > > OK, this way the changes are much smaller and localized -- only the > > > description of CREATE_CONNECTION_LATCH() changes, to: > > > > Hmm. Better, but somehow I'd rather take the 2 last paragraphs about > > the "larval" state completely out, because right now it IMHO says > > either too much or too less. It's not precise enough to tell an > > implementer who hasn't followed that discussion what to do yet it > > outlines at alternative to the key manager establishing the SA > > straight and the ULP latching the connection on the SA. > > I really want to leave the MAY in, as well as the note that that > implies > a state that we're not describing. I'm willing to remove the > parenthetical note, since that's really informative of something that > implementors, who chose to implement that MAY, would figure out on > their > own anyways. > > > If you want to keep the "larval" text in, I've did some wordsmithing > > below that you might want to consider: > > I can't tell what's particularly different in your text. You did split > a sentence, but I think I'll just re-write that sentence this way: I added some words saying that the larval state is transient, and the connection is latched is latched pending establishement of the SA, see below: > "Such an implementation may require an additional state in the > connection latch state machine: a "LARVAL" state, so to speak, that is > not described herein." > > I think the colon helps more than either the comma I had written > originally, or than a period. So how about: Such an implementation may require an additional transient state in the connection latch state machine: a "LARVAL" state, so to speak, to which the connection is latched pending establishment of the SA. Such a "LARVAL" state is not described further herein. --julien
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.