On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 09:30:08AM -0700, Laganier, Julien wrote: > So how about: > > Such an implementation may require an additional transient state in > the connection latch state machine: a "LARVAL" state, so to speak, to > which the connection is latched pending establishment of the SA. Such > a "LARVAL" state is not described further herein. "transient" seems confusable/redundant to me: all these states are transient, in a way, since a latch is never permanently in one state. In the case of the CLOSED state I used the word "fleeting"; "ephemeral" would work just as well. I will use the word "fleeting", since I've already used it to the same effect. I'll send an updated .xml file to the RFC-Editor later today. Thanks! Nico --
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.