[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[btns] Security UDT

From: "DB" <dbernard at ozonline.com.au>
To: <btns at ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:51:33 +1100
In-reply-to: <20091016211652.GV892 at Sun.COM>
References: <20091015221608.GC907 at Sun.COM><BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1C2A67DF98 at NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com><20091016203953.GQ892 at Sun.COM><BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1C2A67DFC1 at NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com> <20091016211652.GV892 at Sun.COM>

I dont know how this WG works, but could this be included in your nextagenda?

I need your inputs and comments,

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-d-sec-udt-00

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [btns] Security UDT
  - From: Joe Touch

References:
- [btns] Minor connection-latch problem in AUTH48
  - From: Nicolas Williams
- Re: [btns] Minor connection-latch problem in AUTH48
  - From: Laganier, Julien
- Re: [btns] Minor connection-latch problem in AUTH48
  - From: Nicolas Williams
- Re: [btns] Minor connection-latch problem in AUTH48
  - From: Laganier, Julien
- Re: [btns] Minor connection-latch problem in AUTH48
  - From: Nicolas Williams

Prev by Date: Re: [btns] Minor connection-latch problem in AUTH48
Next by Date: Re: [btns] Security UDT
Previous by thread: Re: [btns] Minor connection-latch problem in AUTH48
Next by thread: Re: [btns] Security UDT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.