[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [btns] Security UDT

From: Joe Touch <touch at ISI.EDU>
To: DB <dbernard at ozonline.com.au>
Cc: "<btns at ietf.org>" <btns at ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:29:21 -0400
In-reply-to: <2A5090A900C84CBCBF98A5C2D900EF88 at DanielPC>
References: <20091015221608.GC907 at Sun.COM><BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1C2A67DF98 at NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com><20091016203953.GQ892 at Sun.COM><BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1C2A67DFC1 at NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com> <20091016211652.GV892 at Sun.COM> <2A5090A900C84CBCBF98A5C2D900EF88 at DanielPC>

Seems out of scope for BTNS. See our charter. You might try SAAG.

Joe


On Oct 21, 2009, at 4:51 PM, "DB" <dbernard at ozonline.com.au> wrote:

I dont know how this WG works, but could this be included in yournext agenda?

I need your inputs and comments,

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-d-sec-udt-00

_______________________________________________
btns mailing list
btns at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns

References:
- [btns] Minor connection-latch problem in AUTH48
  - From: Nicolas Williams
- Re: [btns] Minor connection-latch problem in AUTH48
  - From: Laganier, Julien
- Re: [btns] Minor connection-latch problem in AUTH48
  - From: Nicolas Williams
- Re: [btns] Minor connection-latch problem in AUTH48
  - From: Laganier, Julien
- Re: [btns] Minor connection-latch problem in AUTH48
  - From: Nicolas Williams
- [btns] Security UDT
  - From: DB

Prev by Date: [btns] Security UDT
Next by Date: [btns] RFC 5660 on IPsec Channels: Connection Latching
Previous by thread: [btns] Security UDT
Next by thread: [btns] RFC 5660 on IPsec Channels: Connection Latching
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.