[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [btns] Security UDT

From: Joe Touch <touch at isi.edu>
To: DB <dbernard at ozonline.com.au>
Cc: btns at ietf.org
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:54:53 -0700
In-reply-to: <2A5090A900C84CBCBF98A5C2D900EF88 at DanielPC>
References: <20091015221608.GC907 at Sun.COM><BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1C2A67DF98 at NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com><20091016203953.GQ892 at Sun.COM><BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1C2A67DFC1 at NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com> <20091016211652.GV892 at Sun.COM> <2A5090A900C84CBCBF98A5C2D900EF88 at DanielPC>

10/21/2009 I responded to a similar request indicating that UDT was outof scope for BTNS, based on the charter at that time.


The WG has since concluded.

Joe

On 10/21/2009 1:51 PM, DB wrote:

I dont know how this WG works, but could this be included in your next
agenda?
I need your inputs and comments,

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-d-sec-udt-00

_______________________________________________
btns mailing list
btns at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns

References:
- [btns] Minor connection-latch problem in AUTH48
  - From: Nicolas Williams
- Re: [btns] Minor connection-latch problem in AUTH48
  - From: Laganier, Julien
- Re: [btns] Minor connection-latch problem in AUTH48
  - From: Nicolas Williams
- Re: [btns] Minor connection-latch problem in AUTH48
  - From: Laganier, Julien
- Re: [btns] Minor connection-latch problem in AUTH48
  - From: Nicolas Williams
- [btns] Security UDT
  - From: DB

Prev by Date: Re: [btns] WG Action: Conclusion of Better-Than-Nothing Security (btns)
Previous by thread: Re: [btns] Security UDT
Next by thread: [btns] RFC 5660 on IPsec Channels: Connection Latching
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.