[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [CCAMP] [PWE3] poll on making draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-analysis-07.txt a working group draft



I like this idea. 




On Oct 21, 2009, at 12:53 PM, David Ward <dward at cisco.com> wrote:

Note that if we decide not to take the document in it's current form (history of decision making), the data could be incorporated into the OAM architecture draft under construction. We don't want to lose the information. 

-DWard

On Oct 20, 2009, at 4:51 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:

I disagree. I believe that it is useful to document the OAM design
decision and that this document is a good starting point.

Remember that the poll is not whether to publish this document
at any particular time, but to accept it as a starting point for
the work of the WG.

As such I think the document is useful, and a good staring point,
which is why I expressed the view that it should become a WG doc.

Stewart



Sadler, Jonathan B. wrote:
I agree with Tom that this document seems to be more of a set of meeting minutes/notes.  I don't see any reasoned analysis - just a statement of what is different between the two mechanisms and the requirements along with a recommendation.

The fact no discussion of inter-layer interactions is shown in this document really concerns me as I believe its missing a key difference between the approaches catalogued.

If the document contained reasoned analysis and delt with all issues, I would be able to support it.  But in its current form it is lacking the required substance.

Jonathan Sadler

________________________________________
From: ccamp-bounces at ietf.org [ccamp-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas D. Nadeau [tom.nadeau at bt.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:27 PM
To: Loa Andersson; mpls-tp at ietf.org; pwe3 at ietf.org; ccamp at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-analysis-07.txt a working group draft

    As I said earlier, I do not see the point in bringing this document
forward. I viewed it more as a set of meeting minutes/notes that were held
by the MEAD team, and as such has served its purpose.

    --Tom



On 10/18/09 1:49 PM, "Loa Andersson" <loa at pi.nu> wrote:

  
Working Group,

the authors of draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-analysis-07.txt have
asked that the draft is adopted as an mpls working group document.

This mail starts a two week poll on making the draft a working group
document. Send a mail to the mpls-tp at ietf.org mailing list, indicating
"yes/support" or "no/do not support".

Comments on the content should be sent to the same mailing list with
a different subject line.

The poll ends Fri Oct 30.

Loa and George
MPLS working group co-chairs
    

--
Principal Architect - 21CN Networks


_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3 at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3

  

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3 at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3 at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3