[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt

To: cfrg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt
From: daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner)
Date: 16 Aug 2002 11:53:10 GMT
Distribution: isaac
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.ietf.org>
Newsgroups: isaac.lists.ietf-cfrg
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
References: <200208160411.QAA18674@ruru.cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Sender: cfrg-admin@ietf.org

Peter Gutmann wrote:
>If it's truly unencumbered, I'd like to see this as standards-track.

Can you elaborate?  What advantages do you see for CCM over
the standard encrypt-then-authenticate generic composition of
AES-CBC encryption and AES-CBC-MAC (suitably modified to be
secure for variable-length messages)?  The latter is unencumbered
and has the same performance characteristics as CCM.

_______________________________________________
Cfrg mailing list
Cfrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt
  - From: Gé Weijers

References:
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt
  - From: Peter Gutmann

Prev by Date: Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt
Next by Date: Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt
Previous by thread: Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt
Next by thread: Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread