[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Cfrg] HMAC-MD5

To: cfrg at ietf.org
Subject: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5
From: Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:20:59 -0500
List-help: <mailto:cfrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:cfrg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>

At the SAAG session last week, Sam and I were asked about HMAC-MD5. Is it safe to keep using it? Should we encourage people to use HMAC-SHA1 or HMAC-SHA256 instead? Why?

Please provide advice on this matter in the next two weeks. We have on working group that needs this advice very soon.

Russ


_______________________________________________
Cfrg mailing list
Cfrg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5
  - From: D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5
  - From: michaelslists
- Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5
  - From: Daniel Brown
- Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5
  - From: Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5
  - From: David Wagner

Prev by Date: RE: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols
Next by Date: Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5
Previous by thread: RE: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols
Next by thread: Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread