[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5

To: Ben Laurie <ben at algroup.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:18:54 -0800
Cc: cfrg at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <442A991D.5030308@algroup.co.uk>
List-help: <mailto:cfrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:cfrg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <7.0.0.16.2.20060328155157.05b69860@vigilsec.com> <20060328181121.95e10f09.smb@cs.columbia.edu> <442A991D.5030308@algroup.co.uk>

At 3:26 PM +0100 3/29/06, Ben Laurie wrote:

Just an extra data point, I believe the latest s/w for collisions has it
down to just two seconds!

Serious question: why is this a data point for the question about HMAC-MD5? What part of being able to make essentially as many collisions as you want as quickly as you want affects whether or not we should continue to use HMAC-MD5?

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

_______________________________________________
Cfrg mailing list
Cfrg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5
  - From: Steven M. Bellovin

References:
- [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5
  - From: Russ Housley
- Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5
  - From: Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5
  - From: Ben Laurie

Prev by Date: Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5
Next by Date: Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5
Previous by thread: Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5
Next by thread: Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread