[Cfrg] DNSSEC considering adopting GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94

[Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT chair <ogud at ogud.com>]

This message is a request for information.
In an old CFRG thread
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/current/msg01170.html
I asked for some guidance on defining ECC algorithms for DNSSEC.

We now have the first concrete proposal for an ECC algorithm,
        GOST R 34.10-2001 a ECC public key algorithm
        GOST R 34.11-94  a hash algorithm
preliminary ID: (more politics than technical)
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dolmatov-dnsext-dnssec-gost-00.txt


Both algorithms have been added to at least one IETF protocol (RFC4490).
The DNS community is inclined to seriously consider the adoption of these
algorithms, but we are not crypto experts.

Question #1: Is there a cryptographic reason why GOST R 34.10-2001
should NOT be considered for adoption by DNS?

Previously I have received suggestions for following ECC curves:
        P-256, P-384 and Curve25519.

Question #2: Is there a cryptographic reason why GOST R 34.11-94
should NOT be considered for adoption by DNS?

        thanks
        Olafur