Re: [Cfrg] [saag] GOST algorithms descriptions

["Gregory S. Chudov" <chudov at cryptopro.ru>]

> (id-GostR3411-94-CryptoProParamSet) in all situations. Given that all
> (?)  IETF GOST standards use this param set, why not provide test
> vectors for it rather than the (otherwise unused) TestParamSet?

My understanding is that the drafts are an exact translation of the
official standard,
including the examples, as published in 1994. That kind of makes those examples
reliable and official, but of course additional examples wouldn't hurt.

Also, there is an example of gost3411-94 digest with gost3410-2001
signature in rfc4491.txt.
The bad news is that only the source data and final result (signature
value) are provided there,
with no intermediate values.