Crypto Forum Research Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index] [IETF Announcements Archive]

Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5, (continued)
- Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5, Daniel Brown
- Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5, michaelslists
- Re: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5, D. J. Bernstein
- RE: [Cfrg] HMAC-MD5, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Cfrg] Licensing of ECC (was: Defining inter operable ECC keys infor IETF protocols), Blumenthal, Uri
[Cfrg] Licensing of ECC (was: Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols), Blumenthal, Uri
- Re: [Cfrg] Licensing of ECC (was: Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols), D. J. Bernstein
RE: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols (fwd), Yvonne Cliff
[Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Ólafur Guðmundsson
- Re: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Yvonne Cliff
- Re: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Daniel Brown
  - Message not available
    - Re: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Ólafur Guðmundsson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - RE: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Scott Fluhrer
  - Re: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Hal Finney
- RE: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Blumenthal, Uri
  - RE: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Peter Gutmann
- RE: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Whyte, William
- RE: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Whyte, William
- RE: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Whyte, William
  - RE: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Ólafur Guðmundsson
    - Re: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Ben Laurie
  - RE: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Russ Housley
    - Re: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Adam Back
- RE: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Blumenthal, Uri
- RE: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Cfrg] Defining inter operable ECC keys in for IETF protocols, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Cfrg] Two NIST Draft documents: FIPS 186-3 and NIST SP 800-89, Russ Housley
[Cfrg] RFC 4418 on UMAC: Message Authentication Code using Universal Hashing, rfc-editor
RE: [Cfrg] New Proofs for NMAC and HMAC: Security Without Collision-Resistance, Praveen Gauravaram
- Re: [Cfrg] New Proofs for NMAC and HMAC: Security Without Collision-Resistance, David McGrew
RE: [Cfrg] New Proofs for NMAC and HMAC: Security Without Collision-Resistance, Blumenthal, Uri
- Re: [Cfrg] New Proofs for NMAC and HMAC: Security Without Collision-Resistance, David McGrew
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Cfrg] New Proofs for NMAC and HMAC: Security Without Collision-Resistance, Blumenthal, Uri
  - Re: [Cfrg] New Proofs for NMAC and HMAC: Security Without Collision-Resistance, D. J. Bernstein
[Cfrg] New Proofs for NMAC and HMAC: Security Without Collision-Resistance, Paul Hoffman
[Cfrg] Pre-call for submissions for IEEE Std 1363-2000 revision, Whyte, William
[Cfrg] Fwd: Comments requested on NIST Draft RNG Publication, Russ Housley
[Cfrg] Document Action: 'UMAC: Message Authentication Code using Universal Hashing' to Informational RFC, The IESG
[Cfrg] SHA1-IME, Blumenthal, Uri
[Cfrg] Please review: draft-songlee-aes-cmac-02.txt, Russ Housley
[Cfrg] Re: Cfrg Digest, Vol 16, Issue 43, John Kelsey
- Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), D. J. Bernstein
[Cfrg] On using ROs for analyzing randomness extraction functions, David Wagner
- Re: [Cfrg] On using ROs for analyzing randomness extraction functions, Jack Lloyd
- Re: [Cfrg] On using ROs for analyzing randomness extraction functions, canetti
  - Re: [Cfrg] On using ROs for analyzing randomness extraction functions, John Wilkinson
    - Re: [Cfrg] On using ROs for analyzing randomness extraction functions, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] On using ROs for analyzing randomness extraction functions, John Wilkinson
    - Re: [Cfrg] On using ROs for analyzing randomness extraction functions, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] On using ROs for analyzing randomness extraction functions, John Wilkinson
    - Re: [Cfrg] On using ROs for analyzing randomness extraction functions, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] On using ROs for analyzing randomness extraction functions, canetti
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Cfrg] On using ROs for analyzing randomness extraction functions, David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] On using ROs for analyzing randomness extraction functions, Jack Lloyd
- RE: [Cfrg] On using ROs for analyzing randomness extraction functions, Ilya Mironov
[Cfrg] KDF: Randomness extraction vs. key expansion, canetti
- [Cfrg] On using ROs for analyzing randomness extraction functions, canetti
- [Cfrg] Re: [saag] KDF: Randomness extraction vs. key expansion, Bill Sommerfeld
  - [Cfrg] Re: [saag] KDF: Randomness extraction vs. key expansion, canetti
- [Cfrg] Re: [saag] KDF: Randomness extraction vs. key expansion, Nicolas Williams
- Re: [Cfrg] KDF: Randomness extraction vs. key expansion, D. J. Bernstein
  - Re: [saag] Re: [Cfrg] KDF: Randomness extraction vs. key expansion, canetti
    - Re: [saag] Re: [Cfrg] KDF: Randomness extraction vs. key expansion, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [saag] Re: [Cfrg] KDF: Randomness extraction vs. key expansion, canetti
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Cfrg] KDF: Randomness extraction vs. key expansion, David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] KDF: Randomness extraction vs. key expansion, canetti
- [Cfrg] KDF: Randomness extraction vs. key expansion, David Wagner
[Cfrg] RE: KDF algorithm and properties, Allen Pulsifer
[Cfrg] KDF algorithm and properties, Allen Pulsifer
Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), Hugo Krawczyk
- Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), Daniel Brown
  - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), Hugo Krawczyk
- Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), D. J. Bernstein
  - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), Hugo Krawczyk
- Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), Hugo Krawczyk
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), John Wilkinson
    - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), Jack Lloyd
    - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), John Wilkinson
- [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), D. J. Bernstein
- [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), John Wilkinson
  - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), D. J. Bernstein
- [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), John Wilkinson
  - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), D. J. Bernstein
- [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), John Wilkinson
  - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation (fwd), D. J. Bernstein
KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], David Wagner
- Re: KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], David McGrew
- RE: KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], Simon Blake-Wilson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], David Wagner
- KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], David Wagner
  - Re: KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], D. J. Bernstein
  - Re: KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], David McGrew
    - [Cfrg] Re: Extractors/KDF definition and goal, csjutla
- KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], David Wagner
- KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], David Wagner
  - RE: KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], Simon Blake-Wilson
    - RE: KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], Daniel Brown
- KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], David Wagner
- KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], David Wagner
  - Re: KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], D. J. Bernstein
- KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], David Wagner
- KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], David Wagner
- KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], David Wagner
  - Re: KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], D. J. Bernstein
- KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], David Wagner
  - Re: KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], D. J. Bernstein
- KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], David Wagner
  - Re: KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], John Wilkinson
  - Re: KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], D. J. Bernstein
- KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], David Wagner
- KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], David Wagner
  - Re: KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], canetti
[Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, David McGrew
- RE: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Scott Fluhrer
  - RE: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Simon Blake-Wilson
    - RE: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Tom Shrimpton
    - RE: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Simon Blake-Wilson
    - RE: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Tom Shrimpton
    - RE: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Simon Blake-Wilson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, David Wagner
  - RE: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Simon Blake-Wilson
- [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Daniel Brown
  - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Paul Hoffman
- RE: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Blumenthal, Uri
  - RE: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Simon Blake-Wilson
    - KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], David McGrew
    - Re: KDF definition and goal [was: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation], David McGrew
  - RE: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Scott Fluhrer
- [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, David Wagner
  - RE: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Simon Blake-Wilson
- RE: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Blumenthal, Uri
  - RE: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Tom Shrimpton
- [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, D. J. Bernstein
- [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Jack Lloyd
  - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Daniel Brown
- [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, David Wagner
- [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, David Wagner
- [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, David Wagner
- [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Daniel Brown
- [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Jack Lloyd
- [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Daniel Brown
- [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, Daniel Brown
- [Cfrg] Fwd: Hash-Based Key Derivation, David Wagner
[Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', canetti
  - Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', canetti
- Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', David McGrew
  - Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', David McGrew
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', Hal Finney
  - Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', David McGrew
- [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', David Wagner
- Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', Ted Krovetz
  - Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', D. J. Bernstein
  - Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', canetti
    - Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', Ted Krovetz
    - Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', Geir Myrdahl Køien
    - Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', canetti
  - Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', Ted Krovetz
  - Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', D. J. Bernstein
[Cfrg] status of SSL vs SHA-1/MD-5, etc.?, Alex Alten
- [Cfrg] Re: [saag] status of SSL vs SHA-1/MD-5, etc.?, Steven M. Bellovin
  - [Cfrg] Re: [saag] status of SSL vs SHA-1/MD-5, etc.?, Ben Laurie
    - [Cfrg] Re: [saag] status of SSL vs SHA-1/MD-5, etc.?, Steven M. Bellovin
- [Cfrg] Re: status of SSL vs SHA-1/MD-5, etc.?, Ian G
[Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, canetti
  - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, canetti
    - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, Hugo Krawczyk
    - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, canetti
    - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, D. J. Bernstein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, John Wilkinson
- Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, Ted Krovetz
  - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, D. J. Bernstein
  - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, canetti
- [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, D. J. Bernstein
- [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, David Wagner
[Cfrg] CFRG guidelines for conduct, David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] CFRG guidelines for conduct, D. J. Bernstein
[Cfrg] Re: Cfrg mud-fight, Shai Halevi
[Cfrg] UMAC security proof posted, Ted Krovetz
- Re: [Cfrg] UMAC security proof posted, D. J. Bernstein
  - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC security proof posted, Hal Finney
    - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC security proof posted, D. J. Bernstein
  - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC security proof posted, Hugo Krawczyk
    - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC security proof posted, D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] UMAC security proof posted, John Wilkinson
  - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC security proof posted, Hugo Krawczyk
    - Message not available
    - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC security proof posted, Greg Rose
    - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC security proof posted, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC security proof posted, Greg Rose
    - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC security proof posted, D. J. Bernstein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Cfrg] UMAC security proof posted, Ted Krovetz
- RE: [Cfrg] UMAC security proof posted, Blumenthal, Uri
- Re: [Cfrg] UMAC security proof posted, Ted Krovetz
[Cfrg] Re: expectations for security claims and guidance, Shai Halevi
[Cfrg] Re: UMAC, Shai Halevi
- Re: [Cfrg] Re: UMAC, John Wilkinson
- Re: [Cfrg] Re: UMAC, D. J. Bernstein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Cfrg] Re: UMAC, Shai Halevi
  - Re: [Cfrg] Re: UMAC, D. J. Bernstein
  - [Cfrg] The UMAC analysis, canetti
    - Re: [Cfrg] The UMAC analysis, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] The UMAC analysis, canetti
[Cfrg] An attack violating the UMAC security claims, David Wagner
- Re: [Cfrg] An attack violating the UMAC security claims, The Purple Streak, Hilarie Orman
- Re: [Cfrg] An attack violating the UMAC security claims, David McGrew
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Cfrg] An attack violating the UMAC security claims, Ted Krovetz
[Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, D. J. Bernstein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, Jack Lloyd
  - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, Paul Hoffman
    - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, canetti
    - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, David McGrew
    - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, Paul Hoffman
    - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, Steven M. Bellovin
    - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, David McGrew
    - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, Steven M. Bellovin
    - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, Paul Hoffman
    - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, Steven M. Bellovin
    - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, Paul Hoffman
    - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, Jack Lloyd
  - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, David McGrew
    - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, Jack Lloyd
    - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, David McGrew
    - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, Greg Rose
    - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, David McGrew
    - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, canetti
    - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, Greg Rose
    - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, Steven M. Bellovin
    - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, Jack Lloyd
    - Re: [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, Mark Baugher
- [Cfrg] expectations for security claims and guidance, David Wagner
[Cfrg] Please stop the UMAC posts!, Ted Krovetz
- Re: [Cfrg] Please stop the UMAC posts!, Hal Finney
- Re: [Cfrg] Please stop the UMAC posts!, D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] Please stop the UMAC posts!, David McGrew
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Cfrg] Please stop the UMAC posts!, David Wagner
- Re: [Cfrg] Please stop the UMAC posts!, Ted Krovetz
  - Re: [Cfrg] Please stop the UMAC posts!, D. J. Bernstein
- RE: [Cfrg] Please stop the UMAC posts!, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Cfrg] More FUD (Re: D. J. Bernstein's non-attack on UMAC), Shai Halevi
- [Cfrg] UMAC's ``rigorously proven'' forgery-probability bounds, D. J. Bernstein
[Cfrg] cfrg at ietf.org, Ted Krovetz
[Cfrg] New UMAC Draft, Ted Krovetz
- Message not available
  - Fwd: [Cfrg] New UMAC Draft, Hal Finney
- Message not available
  - Re: [Cfrg] New UMAC Draft, Ted Krovetz
    - Re: [Cfrg] New UMAC Draft, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] New UMAC Draft, Hal Finney
- Re: [Cfrg] New UMAC Draft, D. J. Bernstein
  - Re: [Cfrg] New UMAC Draft, David McGrew
  - Re: [Cfrg] New UMAC Draft, Mark Baugher
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Cfrg] New UMAC Draft, Ted Krovetz
  - Re: [Cfrg] New UMAC Draft, Hal Finney
    - Re: [Cfrg] New UMAC Draft, Ted Krovetz
    - Re: [Cfrg] New UMAC Draft, D. J. Bernstein
  - Re: [Cfrg] New UMAC Draft, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] New UMAC Draft, Hugo Krawczyk
- Re: [Cfrg] New UMAC Draft, Ted Krovetz
  - Re: [Cfrg] New UMAC Draft, D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] New UMAC Draft, Ted Krovetz
  - Re: [Cfrg] New UMAC Draft, D. J. Bernstein
    - [Cfrg] An attack violating the UMAC security claims, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] An attack violating the UMAC security claims, David McGrew
    - Re: [Cfrg] An attack violating the UMAC security claims, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] An attack violating the UMAC security claims, David McGrew
    - Re: [Cfrg] An attack violating the UMAC security claims, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] An attack violating the UMAC security claims, John Wilkinson
    - Re: [Cfrg] An attack violating the UMAC security claims, canetti
    - Re: [Cfrg] An attack violating the UMAC security claims, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] An attack violating the UMAC security claims, canetti
    - Re: [Cfrg] An attack violating the UMAC security claims, D. J. Bernstein
[Cfrg] RE: UMAC draft changes, Shai Halevi
[Cfrg] Fwd: Preliminary Program for the Cryptographic Hash Workshop (10/31-11/1/2005) Just Posted, Paul Hoffman
[Cfrg] UMAC draft changes, David McGrew
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft changes, Ted Krovetz
  - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft changes, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft changes, David McGrew
  - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft changes, David McGrew
    - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft changes, Ted Krovetz
    - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft changes, David McGrew
[Cfrg] UMAC, Russ Housley
- Re: [Cfrg] UMAC, Hal Finney
  - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC, Hal Finney
    - Re: [Cfrg] UMAC, David Wagner
[Cfrg] Reminder: TCC'06 submission deadline is Tuesday, Sep-6, Shai Halevi
[Cfrg] AES GMAC, Russ Housley
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Cfrg] AES GMAC, kaisa . nyberg
  - Re: [Cfrg] AES GMAC, D. J. Bernstein
  - Re: [Cfrg] AES GMAC, David McGrew
- RE: [Cfrg] AES GMAC, kaisa . nyberg
  - Re: [Cfrg] AES GMAC, David McGrew
    - Message not available
    - [Cfrg] ETSI SAGE, David McGrew
    - Re: [Cfrg] ETSI SAGE, David McGrew
[Cfrg] [saag] Crypto Rump Session to be webcast (fwd), canetti
[Cfrg] Re: SHA Code, Charanjit Jutla
- [Cfrg] Re: SHA Code, David McGrew
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Cfrg] Re: SHA Code, Blumenthal, Uri
[Cfrg] A simple and provably good code for SHA Message Expansion, Charanjit Jutla
- Re: [Cfrg] A simple and provably good code for SHA Message Expansion, David McGrew
- RE: [Cfrg] A simple and provably good code for SHA Message Expansion, Scott Fluhrer
  - RE: [Cfrg] A simple and provably good code for SHA Message Expansion, csjutla
    - RE: [Cfrg] A simple and provably good code for SHA Message Expansion, Scott Fluhrer
    - RE: [Cfrg] A good code for SHA etc., csjutla
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Cfrg] A simple and provably good code for SHA Message Expansion, Charanjit Jutla
[Cfrg] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-rfc3664bis-03.txt, Paul Hoffman
[Cfrg] Fwd: Reminder - Submission Deadline for the Cryptographic Hash Workshop Approaching (7/15/2005), David A. McGrew
[Cfrg] Security review of 802.16e? (fwd), David Wagner
[Cfrg] Fwd: [saag] Hash BoF, David A. McGrew
[Cfrg] Hash BoF, Russ Housley
RE: [Cfrg] Fwd: [saag] [Sam Hartman]draft-harris-ssh-arcfour-fixes-02: informational or proposed?, Blumenthal, Uri
- RE: [Cfrg] Fwd: [saag] [Sam Hartman]draft-harris-ssh-arcfour-fixes-02: informational or proposed?, Peter Gutmann
[Cfrg] Fwd: [saag] [Sam Hartman] draft-harris-ssh-arcfour-fixes-02: informational or proposed?, David A. McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] Fwd: [saag] [Sam Hartman] draft-harris-ssh-arcfour-fixes-02: informational or proposed?, Greg Rose
[Cfrg] new i-d: randomized hashing, Hugo Krawczyk
- Re: [Cfrg] new i-d: randomized hashing, John Wilkinson
  - Re: [Cfrg] new i-d: randomized hashing, Hugo Krawczyk
- Re: [Cfrg] new i-d: randomized hashing, David Wagner
- Re: [Cfrg] new i-d: randomized hashing, Ben Laurie
  - Re: [Cfrg] new i-d: randomized hashing, Jack Lloyd
  - Re: [Cfrg] new i-d: randomized hashing, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] new i-d: randomized hashing, Ben Laurie
    - Re: [Cfrg] new i-d: randomized hashing, Jon Callas
    - Re: [Cfrg] new i-d: randomized hashing, Hugo Krawczyk
    - Re: [Cfrg] new i-d: randomized hashing, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] new i-d: randomized hashing, Hugo Krawczyk
    - Re: [Cfrg] new i-d: randomized hashing, D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] new i-d: randomized hashing, Hal Finney
[Cfrg] Test message, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
[Cfrg] Fwd: Three NIST Special Pubs for Review, Russ Housley
[Cfrg] [saag] Fwd: Cryptographic Hash Workshop - Call for Participation, Paul Hoffman
[Cfrg] Fwd: Cryptographic Hash Workshop - Call for Participation, Tim Polk
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Cfrg] Fwd: Cryptographic Hash Workshop - Call for Participation, Russ Housley
[Cfrg] RSA Signature padding recommendations, Brian Weis
[Cfrg] Fwd: [saag] Attacks on Cryptographic Hashes in Internet Protocols, David A. McGrew
[Cfrg] OCB Mode Internet-Draft Available, Ted Krovetz
- Re: [Cfrg] OCB Mode Internet-Draft Available, Russ Housley
- Re: [Cfrg] OCB Mode Internet-Draft Available, D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] OCB Mode Internet-Draft Available, Peter Gutmann
[Cfrg] Constructions of TCR hashing from MD-type functions, Shai Halevi
[Cfrg] Re: Is target-collision-resistance really harder than full collision-resistance?, Shai Halevi
- Re: [Cfrg] Re: Is target-collision-resistance really harder than full collision-resistance?, D. J. Bernstein
[Cfrg] Is target-collision-resistance really harder than full collision-resistance?, Shai Halevi
- Re: [Cfrg] Is target-collision-resistance really harder than full collision-resistance?, D. J. Bernstein
[Cfrg] Re: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Shai Halevi
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Cfrg] Re: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Shai Halevi
- [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Shai Halevi
  - Re: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Jack Lloyd
    - Re: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, David Wagner
    - Re: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, David Wagner
- [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Shai Halevi
  - Re: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, John Wilkinson
    - Re: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, David Wagner
    - Re: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, John Wilkinson
    - Re: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, david jacobson
    - use of hash functions _in_ CPRNGs (Re: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?), Adam Back
    - Re: use of hash functions _in_ CPRNGs (Re: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?), david jacobson
    - Re: use of hash functions _in_ CPRNGs (Re: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?), Adam Back
    - Re: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, David Wagner
    - Re: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, csjutla
    - Re: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Greg Rose
    - Re: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, csjutla
    - Re: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, D. J. Bernstein
- RE: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: [Cfrg] RE: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, David Wagner
- [Cfrg] Re: Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Shai Halevi
[Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Shai Halevi
- Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Daniel Brown
- Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Hugo Krawczyk
  - Message not available
    - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Russ Housley
    - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, csjutla
    - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Hugo Krawczyk
- Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, D. J. Bernstein
  - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Hugo Krawczyk
    - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Hugo Krawczyk
    - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, David Wagner
    - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Michael Silk
    - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Hugo Krawczyk
    - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, david jacobson
    - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, David Wagner
    - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, David Wagner
    - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, David Wagner
    - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Bodo Moeller
    - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Daniel Brown
    - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, D. J. Bernstein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Steven M. Bellovin
    - Re: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Russ Housley
- RE: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Doug Whiting
- RE: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - RE: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Hugo Krawczyk
- RE: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - RE: [Cfrg] Who needs collision-resistance, anyway?, Hugo Krawczyk
Sorry, that's a digest, not a MAC RE: [Cfrg] Interim MAC function, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Cfrg] MASH Hash Function, John Wilkinson
[Cfrg] Interim MAC function, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Cfrg] Interim MAC function, David Wagner
  - Re: [Cfrg] Interim MAC function, Scott Fluhrer
    - Re: [Cfrg] Interim MAC function, csjutla
    - [Cfrg] SHA-1: No post whitening, csjutla
    - Re: [Cfrg] SHA-1: No post whitening, Scott Fluhrer
    - Re: [Cfrg] SHA-1: No post whitening, csjutla
  - Re: [Cfrg] Interim MAC function, Daniel Brown
  - Re: [Cfrg] Interim MAC function, David Wagner
- Re: [Cfrg] Interim MAC function, Ken Raeburn
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Cfrg] Interim MAC function, Michael Silk
  - RE: [Cfrg] Interim MAC function, csjutla
- RE: [Cfrg] Interim MAC function, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: [Cfrg] Interim MAC function, Michael Silk
  - Re: [Cfrg] Interim MAC function, Michael Silk
    - Re: [Cfrg] Interim MAC function, Michael Silk
  - RE: [Cfrg] Interim MAC function, Daniel Brown
- RE: [Cfrg] Interim MAC function, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - RE: [Cfrg] Interim MAC function, Hugo Krawczyk
[Cfrg] Colliding RFC 3161 time-stamp tokens based on MD5-collisions, Alfonso De Gregorio
[Cfrg] Fwd: [saag] X.509 certificate collision, via MD5 collisions, David A. McGrew
[Cfrg] Re: universal MACs, Ted Krovetz
- Re: [Cfrg] Re: universal MACs, David A. McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] Re: universal MACs, D. J. Bernstein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Cfrg] Re: universal MACs, Erik Zenner
- [Cfrg] Re: universal MACs, Ted Krovetz
  - Re: [Cfrg] Re: universal MACs, D. J. Bernstein
- [Cfrg] Re: universal MACs, Ted Krovetz
[Cfrg] Looking forward to cooperate with you----Our company sell IPphone, ATA, Carol Chang
[Cfrg] Key Wrapping Algorithm Analysius, Russ Housley
[Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Jeff Williams
- Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Alex Alten
  - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, RJ Atkinson
    - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Jeff Williams
    - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, RJ Atkinson
    - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Jeff Williams
    - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, James Hughes
  - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, David A. McGrew
    - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Jeff Williams
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, kaisa . nyberg
- RE: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - RE: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Peter Gutmann
  - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Steven M. Bellovin
  - RE: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Stephen Kent
  - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Sam Hartman
    - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Bill Sommerfeld
  - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, James Hughes
- RE: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Hughes, James P
  - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Algorithm upgrades, RJ Atkinson
    - Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Algorithm upgrades, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, D. J. Bernstein
    - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Bill Sommerfeld
    - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    - Message not available
    - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Jari Arkko
- RE: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Jeff Williams
  - RE: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Peter Gutmann
- RE: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Jeff Williams
  - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Steven M. Bellovin
  - RE: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Gary E. Miller
- RE: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Alex Alten
- RE: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: [Cfrg] Re: [saag] Algorithm upgrades, Jeff Williams
[Cfrg] Last Call: 'The Use of Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) in IPsec ESP' to proposed Standard, canetti

Mail converted by MHonArc