Crypto Forum Research Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', (continued)
  • Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', canetti
  • Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', David McGrew
    • Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', David McGrew
  • [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', David Wagner
    • Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', Hal Finney
    • Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', David McGrew
  • [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', David Wagner
  • Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', Ted Krovetz
    • Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', D. J. Bernstein
    • Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', canetti
      • Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', Ted Krovetz
      • Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', Geir Myrdahl Køien
      • Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', canetti
    • Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', David McGrew
  • Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', Ted Krovetz
    • Re: [Cfrg] Critical gap in the UMAC security ``proof'', D. J. Bernstein
• [Cfrg] status of SSL vs SHA-1/MD-5, etc.?, Alex Alten
  • [Cfrg] Re: [saag] status of SSL vs SHA-1/MD-5, etc.?, Steven M. Bellovin
    • [Cfrg] Re: [saag] status of SSL vs SHA-1/MD-5, etc.?, Ben Laurie
      • [Cfrg] Re: [saag] status of SSL vs SHA-1/MD-5, etc.?, Steven M. Bellovin
  • [Cfrg] Re: status of SSL vs SHA-1/MD-5, etc.?, Ian G
• [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, David McGrew
  • Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, canetti
    • Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06, D. J. Bernstein