Crypto Forum Research Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
[IETF Announcements Archive]
[Cfrg] comments and questions on draft-krawczyk-hkdf and related work,
David McGrew
[Cfrg] soliciting feedback on HKDF,
David McGrew
Re: [Cfrg] soliciting feedback on HKDF,
Blumenthal, Uri
[Cfrg] Fwd: Request for comments on GOST documents,
David McGrew
[Cfrg] [Fwd: Copyrights and the IRTF and Independent Stream],
Aaron Falk
[Cfrg] [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-dolmatov-cryptocom-gost2814789-01.txt],
Basil Dolmatov
[Cfrg] IKEv1 and 800-56A,
Andreasyan Ashot-C23793
[Cfrg] Comments on draft-mcgrew-fundamental-ecc-00,
Sean Shen
[Cfrg] Comments on draft-mcgrew-fundamental-ecc-00.txt,
Yaron Sheffer
[Cfrg] Internet Cryptography Web Pages,
David McGrew
[Cfrg] Fwd: [saag] HKDF draft: draft-krawczyk-hkdf-00,
David McGrew
[Cfrg] GOST algorithms descriptions,
Basil Dolmatov
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Cfrg] GOST algorithms descriptions,
Blumenthal, Uri
[Cfrg] Fwd: NIST - FIPS 186-3: The Digital Signature,
Paul Hoffman
[Cfrg] ISOC sponsoring research paper on Trust and Identity,
David McGrew
[Cfrg] DNSSEC considering adopting GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT chair
- Re: [Cfrg] DNSSEC considering adopting GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94,
Jim Schaad
- Re: [Cfrg] DNSSEC considering adopting GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94,
David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] DNSSEC considering adopting GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Cfrg] DNSSEC considering adopting GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94,
Christian Rechberger
- Re: [Cfrg] DNSSEC considering adopting GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94,
David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] DNSSEC considering adopting GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94,
Blumenthal, Uri
- Re: [Cfrg] DNSSEC considering adopting GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94,
Basil Dolmatov
- Re: [Cfrg] DNSSEC considering adopting GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94,
Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Cfrg] DNSSEC considering adopting GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94,
bmanning
- Re: [Cfrg] DNSSEC considering adopting GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94,
Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Cfrg] DNSSEC considering adopting GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94,
Basil Dolmatov
- Re: [Cfrg] DNSSEC considering adopting GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94,
Eric Rescorla
[Cfrg] AES Key Wrap with Pad,
Russ Housley
[Cfrg] comments on AES Key Wrap with Pad,
David McGrew
[Cfrg] SAAG presentations at IETF 74,
David McGrew
[Cfrg] Standardizing Key Derivation Functions,
David McGrew
[Cfrg] Request for IETF community review of XML Security Specifications,
David McGrew
[Cfrg] CFRG Mail List Archiving Incorrectly,
David McGrew
[Cfrg] FW: I-D Action:draft-sheffer-emu-eap-eke-01.txt,
Yaron Sheffer
[Cfrg] I-D Action:draft-sheffer-emu-eap-eke-00.txt,
David McGrew
Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CAcertificate,
Peter Gutmann
Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogueCAcertificate,
Paul Hoffman
[Cfrg] re-using Diffie-Hellman exponentials,
Dan Harkins
Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CAcertificate,
Peter Gutmann
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CAcertificate,
Robert Moskowitz
Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CAcertificate,
Peter Gutmann
Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CAcertificate,
Peter Gutmann
Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CAcertificate,
Peter Gutmann
Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CAcertificate,
Peter Gutmann
Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CA certificate,
Eric Rescorla
Re: [Cfrg] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CA certificate,
Hugo Krawczyk
Re: [Cfrg] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CA certificate,
Russ Housley
Message not available
Message not available
Message not available
Message not available
Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CAcertificate,
Santosh Chokhani
Message not available
Message not available
Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CA certificate,
Peter Gutmann
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CAcertificate,
Santosh Chokhani
Message not availableRe: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CAcertificate,
Santosh Chokhani
Message not availableRe: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CAcertificate,
Santosh Chokhani
Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CAcertificate,
Peter Gutmann
Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CA certificate,
Eric Rescorla
Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CA certificate,
RJ Atkinson
- Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CA certificate,
Richard Graveman
- Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CAcertificate,
Santosh Chokhani
- Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CAcertificate,
Santosh Chokhani
- Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CAcertificate,
RJ Atkinson
- Re: [Cfrg] [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CAcertificate,
Sean Shen
- [Cfrg] RFC analyzing IETF use of hash functions [was: Re: [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CA certificate],
David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] RFC analyzing IETF use of hash functions [was: Re: [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CA certificate],
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Cfrg] RFC analyzing IETF use of hash functions [was: Re: [saag] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CA certificate],
David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] [saag] RFC analyzing IETF use of hash functions [was:Re: Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CA certificate],
Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: [Cfrg] [saag] RFC analyzing IETF use of hash functions [was: Re: Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CA certificate],
Sean Turner
- Re: [Cfrg] [saag] RFC analyzing IETF use of hash functions [was: Re: Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CA certificate],
Sean Shen
- Re: [Cfrg] [saag] RFC analyzing IETF use of hash functions [was: Re: Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CA certificate],
David McGrew
- [Cfrg] Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs,
Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Cfrg] Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs,
Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Cfrg] Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Cfrg] Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs,
Santosh Chokhani
- Message not available
- Re: [Cfrg] Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Cfrg] Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs,
David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Cfrg] Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs,
David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [Cfrg] suitability of AES-CMAC (was: Re: Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs),
David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] suitability of AES-CMAC (was: Re: Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Cfrg] suitability of AES-CMAC (was: Re: Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs),
Hal Finney
- Re: [Cfrg] suitability of AES-CMAC (was: Re: Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Cfrg] suitability of AES-CMAC (was: Re: Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs),
John Wilkinson
- Re: [Cfrg] suitability of AES-CMAC (was: Re: Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs),
Greg Rose
- Re: [Cfrg] suitability of AES-CMAC (was: Re: Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs),
David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] suitability of AES-CMAC (was: Re: Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs),
Ken Raeburn
- Re: [Cfrg] suitability of AES-CMAC (was: Re: Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Cfrg] suitability of AES-CMAC (was: Re: Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs),
David McGrew
- [Cfrg] suitability of AES-CMAC (was: Re: Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs),
David Wagner
- [Cfrg] Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs,
David Wagner
- Re: [Cfrg] Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [Cfrg] Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs,
David Wagner
- Re: [Cfrg] Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs,
Hugo Krawczyk
- Re: [Cfrg] Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Cfrg] Analyzing IETF use of hash functions -- ORCHIDs,
Hugo Krawczyk
Re: [Cfrg] [saag] RFC analyzing IETF use of hash functions [was: Re: Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CA certificate],
David McGrew
[Cfrg] Further MD5 breaks: Creating a rogue CA certificate,
Russ Housley
[Cfrg] RESEARCH IN THE AREA OF WIRELESS NETWORK SECURITY,
vishwas Rudramurthy
[Cfrg] threshold signatures question,
David McGrew
[Cfrg] draft-mcgrew-tss-01,
David McGrew
[Cfrg] NIST Requests Comments on 3 Draft Documents,
Elaine Barker
[Cfrg] Fwd: NIST Requests Comments,
David McGrew
[Cfrg] NIST requests public comments on revision of FIPS 186-3 (DSS),
Tim Polk
[Cfrg] Requesting guidance on key sizes for 3850bis and 3851bis,
Tim Polk
[Cfrg] Fwd: NIST Released 3 Security Publications,
Paul Hoffman
[Cfrg] Comment Period for FIPS 186-3: Digital Signature Standard,
Sara Caswell
[Cfrg] IRTF List Move,
Glen
[Cfrg] moving CFRG list to irtf.org,
David McGrew
[Cfrg] gdoi implementation,
Pedrito
[Cfrg] [IPsec] Last Call: draft-black-ipsec-ikev2-aead-modes (Using Authenticated Encryption Algorithms with the Encrypted Payload of the Internet Key Exchange version 2 (IKEv2) Protocol) to Proposed Standard (fwd),
Ran Canetti
[Cfrg] new draft on Random Data Encryption Mechanism (RDEM),
David McGrew
Your message to Cosmogol awaits moderator approval,
cosmogol-bounces
Your message to collation awaits moderator approval,
collation-bounces
[Cfrg] New Version Notification for draft-dharkins-siv-aes-03,
Dan Harkins
[Cfrg] Fwd: NIST Identity-Based Encryption Workshop- Registration Deadline Approaching,
Tim Polk
[Cfrg] How about a server-side message with NO HMAC?,
ZhangYuan
[Cfrg] Fwd: [saag] NIST Draft SP 800-108 for public comments,
David McGrew
Re: [Cfrg] Review of: draft-lochter-pkix-brainpool-ecc-01,
Hal Finney
Re: [Cfrg] draft-lochter-pkix-brainpool-ecc-01.txt,
David McGrew
[Cfrg] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lochter-pkix-brainpool-ecc-01.txt,
Paul Hoffman
[Cfrg] NIST requests comments on RSA key generation text,
Russ Housley
RE: [saag] [Cfrg] Re: TCP-AO MAC algorithms,
Sean Shuo Shen
[Cfrg] Re: [saag] TCP-AO MAC algorithms,
mcgrew
[Cfrg] Key Derivation Functions and Randomized Hashing from NIST,
qdang
[Cfrg] FW: New Version Notification for draft-dharkins-siv-aes-01,
Dan Harkins
[Cfrg] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-kato-camellia-ctrccm-00.txt],
KATO Akihiro
[Cfrg] NIST Issues Call for a New Hash Algorithm,
Russ Housley
[Cfrg] New CFRG I-D: Fast MAC Requirements,
Brian Weis
[Cfrg] New Randomized Hashing Draft,
Hugo Krawczyk
[Cfrg] Comments on SIV and draft-dharkins-siv-aes-00,
mcgrew
[Cfrg] Test Mail,
vishwas Rudramurthy
[Cfrg] comments on draft-mcgrew-auth-enc-03.txt,
Phillip Rogaway
[Cfrg] draft-mcgrew-auth-enc-03.txt,
Dan Harkins
[Cfrg] Fwd: [saag] Security review of RADIUS crypto-agility proposals?,
David McGrew
[Cfrg] background for SAAG presentation for on variant of GCM,
Tim Polk
RE: [Cfrg] Question on key size reduction for Cipher-based PRFs and MACs,
Narayanan, Vidya
[Cfrg] Question on key size reduction for Cipher-based PRFs and MACs,
Narayanan, Vidya
[Cfrg] new I-D for authenticated encryption,
Dan Harkins
[Cfrg] Fwd: Last Call: draft-mcgrew-auth-enc (An Interface and Algorithms for Authenticated Encryption) to Proposed Standard,
Paul Hoffman
[Cfrg] Forward symmetric encryption,
ngaga Gisse
[Cfrg] Public comments on the NIST hash algorithm requirements and evaluation criteria,
Russ Housley
[Cfrg] What can be done if TTP fails?,
ngaga Gisse
[Cfrg] Is it possible to verify your own signature?,
ngaga Gisse
[Cfrg] VMAC Internet-Draft Available,
Ted Krovetz
[Cfrg] Non Zero Constants in HMAC-SHAx,
Manav Bhatia
[Cfrg] Using the same public/private key pair for encryption and signatures,
Narayanan, Vidya
[Cfrg] NIST Request for Comments on primality testing,
Elaine Barker
[Cfrg] NIST announces Draft Requirements and Evaluation Criteria for New Hash Algorithms,
Shu-jen Chang
[Cfrg] draft-martin-ibcs,
Russ Housley
[Cfrg] RE: how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Cfrg] how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Wei Dai
- [Cfrg] Re: how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Wei Dai
- Re: [Cfrg] how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Hal Finney
- [Cfrg] how to ensure unpredictability (or non-repeatingness) in the presence of restarts or rollbacks,
zooko
- Re: [Cfrg] how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: [Cfrg] how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Wei Dai
- Re: [Cfrg] how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Cfrg] how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: [Cfrg] how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Hal Finney
- Re: [Cfrg] how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Jon Callas
- Re: [Cfrg] how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Ariel Waissbein
- Re: [Cfrg] how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Wei Dai
- Re: [Cfrg] how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Hal Finney
- Re: [Cfrg] how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Peter Gutmann
- RE: [Cfrg] how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Wei Dai
- Re: [Cfrg] how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Wei Dai
- Re: [Cfrg] how to guard against VM rollbacks,
David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Wei Dai
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [CFRG] how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Phillip Rogaway
- RE: [Cfrg] how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Cfrg] how to guard against VM rollbacks,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Cfrg] consequences of nonce reuse,
Wei Dai
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Cfrg] consequences of nonce reuse,
Ted Krovetz
Re: [Cfrg] consequences of nonce reuse,
Peter Gutmann
RE: [Cfrg] Applications of target collisions: Pre or post-datingMD5-based RFC 3161 time-stamp tokens,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Cfrg] Applications of target collisions: Pre or post-dating MD5-based RFC 3161 time-stamp tokens,
Alfonso De Gregorio
[Cfrg] target collisions and colliding certificates with different identities,
Weger, B.M.M. de
[Cfrg] question on secure key distribution,
Dan Harkins
[Cfrg] SCS draft,
thomas fossati
[Cfrg] e=3 a bad idea?,
Steven M. Bellovin
[Cfrg] Invitation to review Bluetooth Simple Pairing draft specification,
Robert Hulvey
[Cfrg] IVs in the "authenticated encryption" draft,
David McGrew
[Cfrg] Second NIST Hash Workshop,
David McGrew
[Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
David A. McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
Hal Finney
- Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
Greg Rose
- Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
David A. McGrew
- Message not available
- Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
John Wilkinson
- Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
John Wilkinson
- Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
John Wilkinson
- Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
David McGrew
- RE: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
Doug Whiting
- Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
John Wilkinson
- Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
John Wilkinson
- Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
D. J. Bernstein
Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
David Wagner
Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
Hal Finney
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
Ted Krovetz
Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
David A. McGrew
RE: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
Santosh Chokhani
Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
Ken Raeburn
RE: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
Blumenthal, Uri
Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
Tom Shrimpton
Re: [Cfrg] new authenticated encryption draft,
Phillip Rogaway
[Cfrg] Who agree with building block cipher, hash, MAC with same round function and key schedulel,
duo lei
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Cfrg] Who agree with building block cipher, hash, MAC with same round function and key schedulel,
Blumenthal, Uri
- Re: [Cfrg] Who agree with building block cipher, hash, MAC with same round function and key schedulel,
David McGrew
- RE: [Cfrg] Who agree with building block cipher, hash, MAC with same round function and key schedulel,
Dan Harkins
- Re: [Cfrg] Who agree with building block cipher, hash, MAC with same round function and key schedulel,
duo lei
- Re: [Cfrg] Who agree with building block cipher, hash, MAC with same round function and key schedulel,
Praveen Gauravaram
- Re: [Cfrg] Who agree with building block cipher, hash, MAC with same round function and key schedulel,
duo lei
- Re: [Cfrg] Who agree with building block cipher, hash, MAC with same round function and key schedulel,
duo lei
- Re: [Cfrg] Who agree with building block cipher, hash, MAC with same round function and key schedulel,
Praveen Gauravaram
- Re: [Cfrg] Who agree with building block cipher, hash, MAC with same round function and key schedulel,
Steven M. Bellovin
- RE: [Cfrg] Who agree with building block cipher, hash, MAC with same round function and key schedulel,
Blumenthal, Uri
- RE: [Cfrg] Who agree with building block cipher, hash, MAC with same round function and key schedulel,
Blumenthal, Uri
- RE: [Cfrg] Who agree with building block cipher, hash, MAC with same round function and key schedulel,
Blumenthal, Uri
- RE: [Cfrg] Who agree with building block cipher, hash, MAC with same round function and key schedulel,
Blumenthal, Uri
- RE: [Cfrg] Who agree with building block cipher, hash, MAC with same round function and key schedulel,
Blumenthal, Uri
[Cfrg] GOST hash function specification,
Praveen Gauravaram
[Cfrg] Derivation of an AES key from hash function,
ngaga Gisse
[Cfrg] Re: Cfrg Digest, Vol 23, Issue 2,
qdang
[Cfrg] Re: Cfrg Digest, Vol 23, Issue 3,
qdang
Re: [Cfrg] Derivation of an AES key from hash function (SHA-1, 256, 512),
ngaga Gisse
Re: [Cfrg] Derivation of an AES key from hash function (SHA-1, 256, 5,
ngaga Gisse
[Cfrg] Derivation of an AES key from hash function (SHA-1, 256, 512),
ngaga Gisse
[Cfrg] security of HMAC,
Steven M. Bellovin
[Cfrg] HMAC-MD5,
Russ Housley
Mail converted by MHonArc
