[conex] IPR on ConEx mechanisms
Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com> Thu, 29 March 2012 09:14 UTC
Return-Path: <bob.briscoe@bt.com>
X-Original-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E250321F8A1B for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.674
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.674 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TDc7Z+EZYzv9 for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hubrelay-by-04.bt.com (hubrelay-by-04.bt.com [62.7.242.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588F321F8A1A for <conex@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EVMHR71-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net (10.36.3.109) by EVMHR04-UKBR.bt.com (10.216.161.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:14:37 +0100
Received: from dyw02134app01.domain1.systemhost.net (193.113.249.13) by EVMHR71-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net (10.36.3.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:14:37 +0100
Received: from cbibipnt05.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (147.149.196.177) by dyw02134app01.domain1.systemhost.net (10.35.25.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:14:30 +0100
Received: From bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk ([132.146.168.158]) by cbibipnt05.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.399); id 133301248276; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:14:42 +0100
Received: from MUT.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.73.163.15]) by bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id q2T9ERBT031709; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:14:27 +0100
Message-ID: <201203290914.q2T9ERBT031709@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:14:30 +0100
To: "Eddy Wesley M. [VZ]" <Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov>, ConEx IETF list <conex@ietf.org>
From: Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
Subject: [conex] IPR on ConEx mechanisms
X-BeenThere: conex@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Congestion Exposure working group discussion list <conex.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/conex>
List-Post: <mailto:conex@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:14:42 -0000
Wes as responsible AD, ConEx chairs & list, A request to publish draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses is currently being passed to the IESG. It says that no relevant IPR declaration is known to exist. In the interests of full disclosure, the re-ECN protocol can be thought of as a precursor to ConEx and BT declared its IPR relevant to re-ECN here: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/651/> It is very likely that at least some of the BT patents identified in that BT declaration are also relevant to ConEx. BT is in the process of reviewing its patent portfolio so that it might re-issue the above IPR declaration. Any re-issue will point both to specifications of re-ECN and to specifications of ConEx mechanisms as well as identifying any additional BT patents. Bob ________________________________________________________________ Bob Briscoe, BT Innovate & Design
- [conex] IPR on ConEx mechanisms Bob Briscoe