IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-21: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Wed, 20 August 2014 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095891A069B; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BMrwljAX1BG4; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2548C1A0678; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48CA8811E; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Littlejohn.local (c-76-21-129-88.hsd1.md.comcast.net [76.21.129.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AEE371B0001; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53F4EE21.4030207@innovationslab.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:51:13 -0400
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Rahman, Akbar" <Akbar.Rahman@InterDigital.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20140819144334.30860.77254.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D60519DB022FFA48974A25955FFEC08C05DC0C02@SAM.InterDigital.com> <53F381B0.1040307@innovationslab.net> <D60519DB022FFA48974A25955FFEC08C05DC0C56@SAM.InterDigital.com> <53F3A8FA.2040703@innovationslab.net> <D60519DB022FFA48974A25955FFEC08C05DC0C7D@SAM.InterDigital.com>
In-Reply-To: <D60519DB022FFA48974A25955FFEC08C05DC0C7D@SAM.InterDigital.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FgHP09B9WE93hbASS351k3wb2glCRe0g1"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/aYB9jO3n21_YXjer9ihvgUCE_Qg
Cc: core-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-core-groupcomm@tools.ietf.org, core@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [core] Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-21: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:51:25 -0000

Hi Akbar,

On 8/19/14 5:03 PM, Rahman, Akbar wrote:
> Hi Brian,
> 
> 	 
> Okay.  Now I understand your point.  The thing is that the only real
> "publication" method would have been in the service discovery of item 2.
> So we could re-phrase item 2 to explicitly call this out as follows:
> 
> OLD:
> 
>    2.  If the client is configured to use service discovery including
>        port discovery, it uses a port number obtained via a service
>        discovery lookup operation for the targeted CoAP group.
> 
> 
> NEW:
> 
>    2.  If the client is configured to use service discovery including
>        URI and/or port discovery, it uses the port number obtained via
> the service
>        discovery lookup operation for the targeted CoAP group.
> 
> 
> Does that address your question?
> 

Works for me.  Thanks for taking the time to work through this.

Regards,
Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email