[core] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-21: (with COMMENT)
"Pete Resnick" <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Thu, 21 August 2014 12:14 UTC
Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF171A6F85; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 05:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4gEJC12DxhRA; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 05:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CC21A6F87; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 05:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.6.2.p5
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20140821121434.26081.28936.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 05:14:34 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/XtHtiJuTrnIvO8ULIy3kLj7_8cM
Cc: core-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-core-groupcomm@tools.ietf.org, core@ietf.org
Subject: [core] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-21: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:14:36 -0000
Pete Resnick has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-21: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-groupcomm/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I agree with others: I sure would like to see this be Experimental, see some implementation experience, and, when security issues are sussed out, see it moved onto the Standards Track. A few small comments; nothing earth-shattering: 2.7.2.1/2.7.2.2/2.7.2.6/2.7.2.7: ...the endpoint MUST effect registration...as soon as possible. "MUST" do something "as soon as possible" does not seem like a testable requirement. What purpose is it serving? 2.8: These normative behaviors and guidelines look like they could use 2119 keywords. In particular, quite a few of those "should not"s look like they are meant as "SHOULD NOT"s. They obviously don't need to be, but I was wondering if there was something I was missing.
- [core] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Pete Resnick
- Re: [core] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-i… Barry Leiba
- Re: [core] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-i… Pete Resnick
- Re: [core] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-i… Dijk, Esko
- Re: [core] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-i… Barry Leiba