Unicode identifiers in other RFCs (Was: Syntax

[Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr>]

On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:54:43PM +0100,
 Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote 
 a message of 34 lines which said:

> We are defining a *new* language here. For now, it's for use in IETF
> documents (which are ASCII only). That requirement may change. Or
> people may want to use it for different target documents, such as
> the W3C's, or OASIS.

Regarding *new* languages, I just noticed that the new ROHC-FN
language (a formal language, not a protocol, so it is close from
Cosmogol) says:

> ROHC-FN specifications are case sensitive and are written in the
> 7-bit ASCII character set (as defined in [RFC2822]) and consist of
> [...]

ROHC-FN is specified in draft-ietf-rohc-formal-notation-13 which has
been approved by the IESG on the Standards Track (but not yet
published as a RFC).

_______________________________________________
Cosmogol mailing list
Cosmogol at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol