[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposed charter for the hypothetical Working Group

To: cosmogol at ietf.org
Subject: Re: Proposed charter for the hypothetical Working Group
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 20:47:20 +0100
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/cosmogol>
List-help: <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: DIscussion on state machine specification in IETF protocols <cosmogol.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:cosmogol@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol>, <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol>, <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
References: <20070318185738.GA2941@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

> Flames are welcome as long as they are either:
> 1) "We need no charter at all"
> 2) "Here are the patches I suggest"

Flame:  Where's the proposed FSM charter ?

Something on the way to GMaNe removed what you
attached, or you sent it without the proposal :-)



_______________________________________________
Cosmogol mailing list
Cosmogol at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposed charter for the hypothetical Working Group
  - From: Stephane Bortzmeyer

References:
- Proposed charter for the hypothetical Working Group
  - From: Stephane Bortzmeyer

Prev by Date: Proposed charter for the hypothetical Working Group
Next by Date: Re: Proposed charter for the hypothetical Working Group
Previous by thread: Proposed charter for the hypothetical Working Group
Next by thread: Re: Proposed charter for the hypothetical Working Group
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread