dane Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [dane List Information]

• Mar 20 2012
• [dane] 1: Q for 1.3, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] AD review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-18, Paul Hoffman
• [dane] AD review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-18, Stephen Farrell
• Re: [dane] Hash specs, and examples in sec. 2.3, Paul Hoffman
• Mar 19 2012
• Re: [dane] Hash specs, and examples in sec. 2.3, Simon Arlott
• Mar 13 2012
• Re: [dane] Making certificate usage type 2 "CA-only"?, Martin Rex
• Mar 12 2012
• Re: [dane] TLSA RRTYPE allocation?, Warren Kumari
• Mar 12 2012
• Re: [dane] TLSA RRTYPE allocation?, James Cloos
• Re: [dane] TLSA RRTYPE allocation?, Paul Hoffman
• [dane] TLSA RRTYPE allocation?, James Cloos
• Re: [dane] Publication requested for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-18, Stephen Farrell
• [dane] Publication requested for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-18, Warren Kumari
• Re: [dane] Draft -18, Peter Sylvester
• Re: [dane] Draft -18, Leif Johansson
• Re: [dane] Making certificate usage type 2 "CA-only"?, Ondrej Mikle
• Re: [dane] Making certificate usage type 2 "CA-only"?, W.C.A. Wijngaards
• Mar 10 2012
• Re: [dane] DNS Caching leftovers, Paul Wouters
• Mar 10 2012
• Re: [dane] Making certificate usage type 2 "CA-only"?, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Making certificate usage type 2 "CA-only"?, Richard L. Barnes
• Mar 09 2012
• Re: [dane] New Version Notification for draft-hoffman-dane-smime-03.txt, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] New Version Notification for draft-hoffman-dane-smime-03.txt, James Cloos
• Re: [dane] Making certificate usage type 2 "CA-only"?, James Cloos
• Re: [dane] New Version Notification for draft-hoffman-dane-smime-03.txt, Paul Hoffman
• [dane] Draft -18, Paul Hoffman
• [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-18.txt, internet-drafts
• Re: [dane] Making certificate usage type 2 "CA-only"?, Jim Schaad
• Re: [dane] Making certificate usage type 2 "CA-only"?, OndÅej SurÃ
• [dane] DNS Caching in Security Considerations, OndÅej SurÃ
• [dane] Nit in 8.1., OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Draft -17 comments, OndÅej SurÃ
• [dane] DNS Caching leftovers, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-17.txt, Jim Schaad
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-17.txt, Paul Hoffman
• Mar 08 2012
• [dane] Making certificate usage type 2 "CA-only"?, Ondrej Mikle
• Mar 07 2012
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-17.txt, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Draft -17 comments, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Draft -17, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Draft -17, Pieter Lexis
• Mar 05 2012
• Re: [dane] Draft -17 comments, Ondrej Mikle
• Mar 04 2012
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-17.txt, Jim Schaad
• Mar 01 2012
• Re: [dane] Draft -17, Ondrej Mikle
• Mar 01 2012
• Re: [dane] Draft -17, Bill Owens
• Re: [dane] Draft -17, Warren Kumari
• Re: [dane] Draft -17 comments, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Draft -17 comments, W.C.A. Wijngaards
• Re: [dane] Draft -17 comments, Paul Wouters
• Feb 29 2012
• Re: [dane] Draft -17 comments, John Gilmore
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Paul Wouters
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Draft -17, Warren Kumari
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Paul Wouters
• [dane] Draft -17, Paul Hoffman
• [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-17.txt, internet-drafts
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, James Cloos
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, OndÅej SurÃ
• Feb 27 2012
• Re: [dane] Call on document name, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, OndÅej SurÃ
• Feb 26 2012
• Re: [dane] Call on document name, Peter Koch
• Re: [dane] Call on PKIX validation -> PKIX certification path validation, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Call on PKIX validation -> PKIX certification path validation, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Call on PKIX validation -> PKIX certification path validation, Paul Hoffman
• Feb 25 2012
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: [dane] Hash specs, and examples in sec. 2.3, Ilari Liusvaara
• Re: [dane] Hash specs, and examples in sec. 2.3, Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] Call on document name, Scott Schmit
• Feb 24 2012
• Re: [dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, Yoav Nir
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Peter Koch
• [dane] 8.2. TLSA Usages, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, OndÅej SurÃ
• [dane] Call on PKIX validation -> PKIX certification path validation, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, Tom Ritter
• Re: [dane] Clarify the text in section 2.1.4., Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [dane] Call on document name, Bill Owens
• Re: [dane] Hash specs, and examples in sec. 2.3, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Call on document name, Pieter Lexis
• [dane] Clarify the text in section 2.1.4., OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Getting rid of usage type 2, Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] Call on document name, Richard L. Barnes
• Re: [dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Getting rid of usage type 2, Richard L. Barnes
• Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, Bill Owens
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, OndÅej SurÃ
• [dane] Call on document name, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, Nicholas Weaver
• Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Getting rid of usage type 2, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Getting rid of usage type 2, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Tom Ritter
• Feb 23 2012
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Tom Ritter
• [dane] Initial set of discussions / feedback from WGLC., Warren Kumari
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Richard L. Barnes
• Re: [dane] Let's all take a deep breath and SLOW DOWN (was Re: WG Last Call item: PKIX validation), OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Let's all take a deep breath and SLOW DOWN (was Re: WG Last Call item: PKIX validation), Paul Hoffman
• [dane] Let's all take a deep breath and SLOW DOWN (was Re: WG Last Call item: PKIX validation), Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Stephen Kent
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] WGLC reminder., Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Bill Owens
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] WGLC reminder., John Gilmore
• Feb 22 2012
• Re: [dane] WGLC reminder., Marco Davids (SIDN)
• [dane] WGLC reminder., Warren Kumari
• Feb 21 2012
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Mark Andrews
• Re: [dane] Security of DNSSEC, Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [dane] Security of DNSSEC, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Security of DNSSEC, Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Security of DNSSEC, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Security of DNSSEC, Martin Rex
• Feb 20 2012
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Record creators and MUST? And TLSA protocol name., Paul Hoffman
• Feb 17 2012
• Re: [dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, James Cloos
• Re: [dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, Scott Schmit
• Re: [dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, James Cloos
• Feb 16 2012
• Re: [dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, James Cloos
• Re: [dane] Security of DNSSEC, Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [dane] Getting rid of usage type 2, James Cloos
• Re: [dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Andrew Sullivan
• [dane] Security of DNSSEC, Paul Hoffman
• [dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, Paul Hoffman
• [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Getting rid of usage type 2, Pieter Lexis
• [dane] Review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16, Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] "First" request TLSA records?, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Getting rid of usage type 2, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Getting rid of usage type 2, John Gilmore
• Re: [dane] Getting rid of usage type 2, Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] Certificate Usages (nits), Paul Hoffman
• [dane] Getting rid of usage type 2, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Certificate Usages, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] DANE deployment document?, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Record creators and MUST? And TLSA protocol name., Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] Record creators and MUST? And TLSA protocol name., Bill Owens
• Re: [dane] DANE deployment document?, Bill Owens
• [dane] Record creators and MUST? And TLSA protocol name., John Gilmore
• [dane] "First" request TLSA records?, John Gilmore
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Matthijs Mekking
• [dane] Certificate Usages (nits), John Gilmore
• [dane] Certificate Usages, John Gilmore
• Re: [dane] DANE deployment document?, John Gilmore
• Feb 15 2012
• Re: [dane] dane-protocol-16 lacks real introductions, John Gilmore
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Deduplicate usage semantics and put semantics in 4 instead of 2.1.1, Richard Barnes
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Matthijs Mekking
• [dane] Deduplicate usage semantics and put semantics in 4 instead of 2.1.1, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] DANE deployment document?, Paul Hoffman
• [dane] DANE deployment document?, Bill Owens
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Matthijs Mekking
• Feb 14 2012
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Richard Barnes
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] dane-protocol-16 lacks real introductions, Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Hash specs, and examples in sec. 2.3, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Hash specs, and examples in sec. 2.3, Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Sean Leonard
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Sean Leonard
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Richard L. Barnes
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] Hash specs, and examples in sec. 2.3, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Richard L. Barnes
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Richard L. Barnes
• Feb 13 2012
• Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, John Gilmore
• Re: [dane] Hash specs, and examples in sec. 2.3, Pieter Lexis
• [dane] Hash specs, and examples in sec. 2.3, John Gilmore
• [dane] dane-protocol-16 comments on Sec 1 to 2.1.4, John Gilmore
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., James Cloos
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Ondrej Mikle
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., W.C.A. Wijngaards
• Feb 12 2012
• Re: [dane] dane-protocol-16 lacks real introductions, bert hubert
• Re: [dane] dane-protocol-16 lacks real introductions, John Gilmore
• Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, Paul Wouters
• Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, Paul Wouters
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Ondrej Mikle
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Stephen Farrell
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Ondrej Mikle
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Ondrej Mikle
• Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, Bill Owens
• Feb 11 2012
• Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, John Gilmore
• Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, Bill Owens
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Sean Leonard
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Stephen Farrell
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] dane-protocol-16 lacks real introductions, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] dane-protocol-16 lacks real introductions, John Gilmore
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, Richard L. Barnes
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Richard L. Barnes
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Richard L. Barnes
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Tom Ritter
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Tom Ritter
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Ondrej Mikle
• Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, Tom Ritter
• Feb 10 2012
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, James Cloos
• [dane] Security considerations for proxies, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, Bill Owens
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, Ilari Liusvaara
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, Bill Owens
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., James Cloos
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Ondrej Mikle
• Feb 09 2012
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Ondrej Mikle
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., James Cloos
• Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
• [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, Pieter Lexis
• Feb 08 2012
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, Zack Weinberg
• [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Warren Kumari
• [dane] The missing section, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, James Cloos
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, Peter Palfrader
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, Paul Hoffman
• [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, internet-drafts
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Bill Owens
• Feb 07 2012
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Warren Kumari
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Scott Schmit
• Feb 06 2012
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Scott Schmit
• Feb 05 2012
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Bill Owens
• Feb 04 2012
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, James Cloos
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Pieter Lexis
• [dane] Draft 15 test page, James Cloos
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Peter Palfrader
• [dane] swede updated to reflect changes introduced in draft 15, Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Jakob Schlyter
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Jakob Schlyter
• [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, internet-drafts
• Feb 03 2012
• Re: [dane] Specifying the certificate encoding in the spec, Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] Specifying the certificate encoding in the spec, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Specifying the certificate encoding in the spec, Richard L. Barnes
• Re: [dane] Specifying the certificate encoding in the spec, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Specifying the certificate encoding in the spec, Richard L. Barnes
• [dane] Specifying the certificate encoding in the spec, Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] #37: Additive assertion of server certificate, dane issue tracker
• Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., OndÅej SurÃ
• Feb 02 2012
• Re: [dane] #28: Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, dane issue tracker
• Re: [dane] 5280 section 6 and DANE usage etc., Stephen Farrell
• Re: [dane] 5280 section 6 and DANE usage etc., Ilari Liusvaara
• [dane] 5280 section 6 and DANE usage etc., Stephen Farrell
• Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] simple key management, Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., James Cloos
• Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Jakob Schlyter
• Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Scott Schmit
• Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Matt McCutchen
• Re: [dane] simple key management, Scott Schmit
• Feb 01 2012
• Re: [dane] simple key management, Stephen Farrell
• Re: [dane] simple key management (was: issue #37 I think), Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] simple key management (was: issue #37 I think), Paul Hoffman
• [dane] simple key management (was: issue #37 I think), Stephen Farrell
• Jan 31 2012
• Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., James Cloos
• Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Tom Ritter
• [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., OndÅej SurÃ
• Jan 28 2012
• Re: [dane] Comments on draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Jakob Schlyter
• [dane] Closing issue #28, Paul Hoffman
• Jan 27 2012
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Warren Kumari
• Re: [dane] Comments on draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Zack Weinberg
• [dane] Comments on draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Bill Owens
• Jan 26 2012
• Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section, Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section A.2.1.1. (draft 14), Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Matt Miller
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Matt Miller
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section A.2.1.1. (draft 14), Scott Schmit
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Stephen Farrell
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Scott Schmit
• Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section A.2.1.1. (draft 14), James Cloos
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Does the WG want to meet in Paris?, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section, Jakob Schlyter
• Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section A.2.1.1. (draft 14), Jakob Schlyter
• Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section A.2.1.1. (draft 14), Scott Schmit
• Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Warren Kumari
• Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Warren Kumari
• Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section, Martin Rex
• Jan 25 2012
• Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section, Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section, Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section, bert hubert
• Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section, Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section A.2.1.1., Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section A.2.1.1. (draft 14), Jakob Schlyter
• [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section A.2.1.1. (draft 14), Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Scott Schmit
• Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Ondrej Mikle
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] Specifying a new trust anchor, Matt McCutchen
• Re: [dane] Specifying a new trust anchor, Matt McCutchen
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Matt McCutchen
• Re: [dane] Specifying a new trust anchor, Scott Schmit
• Jan 24 2012
• Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Specifying a new trust anchor, Martin Rex
• [dane] Specifying a new trust anchor, Paul Hoffman
• [dane] DANE ad RFC 2818, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] New "operational considerations" text (was: Addition to "Security considerations"), Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] New "operational considerations" text (was: Addition to "Security considerations"), Ondrej Mikle
• Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, James Cloos
• Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, dane
• Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Jerry Lundström
• Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Paul Wouters
• Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Scott Schmit
• [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Jim Schaad
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Matt McCutchen
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Jim Schaad
• Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Jim Schaad
• Re: [dane] New "operational considerations" text (was: Addition to "Security considerations"), Jim Schaad
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Matt McCutchen
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Warren Kumari
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Ondrej Mikle
• Jan 23 2012
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] New "operational considerations" text (was: Addition to "Security considerations"), Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Ondrej Mikle
• Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] #35: Behavior for a supported algorithm that is not considered "strong" by the client., dane issue tracker
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #35 - Behavior for a supported algorithm that is not considered "strong" by the client., Warren Kumari
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Zack Weinberg
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Ondrej Mikle
• Re: [dane] New "operational considerations" text (was: Addition to "Security considerations"), Ondrej Mikle
• Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Question regarding draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Paul Wouters
• Re: [dane] Question regarding draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Richard L. Barnes
• Re: [dane] Question regarding draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Matt McCutchen
• Re: [dane] Question regarding draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Scott Schmit
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Matt McCutchen
• Jan 22 2012
• Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, James Cloos
• Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Scott Schmit
• Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, James Cloos
• Re: [dane] Question regarding draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Pieter . Lexis
• Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Scott Schmit
• Re: [dane] Question regarding draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Scott Schmit
• Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Question regarding draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Question regarding draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Scott Schmit
• Re: [dane] existence proof, Simon Arlott
• [dane] Question regarding draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: [dane] existence proof, Tom Ritter
• Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Scott Schmit
• Jan 21 2012
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Mark Andrews
• Re: [dane] existence proof, Scott Schmit
• Re: [dane] Proposed text for A.4 Handling Certificate Rollover, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Scott Schmit
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Scott Schmit
• Jan 20 2012
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Matt Miller
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L. Barnes
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L. Barnes
• Re: [dane] Questions about the current draft (14), Richard L. Barnes
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Warren Kumari
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Mark Andrews
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman
• Jan 19 2012
• Re: [dane] Questions about the current draft (14), Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Questions about the current draft (14), Pieter Lexis
• Re: [dane] Questions about the current draft (14), Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Questions about the current draft (14), Paul Hoffman
• [dane] Questions about the current draft (14), Pieter Lexis
• Jan 18 2012
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Mark Andrews
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Mark Andrews
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, James Cloos
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, James Cloos
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Mark Andrews
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L. Barnes
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Lawrence Conroy
• Jan 17 2012
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Matt Miller
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Jakob Schlyter
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Olafur Gudmundsson
• [dane] existence proof, bmanning
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L. Barnes
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L . Barnes
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, OndÅej SurÃ
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Mark Andrews
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Mark Andrews
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Tony Finch
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Tony Finch
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, James Cloos
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, James Cloos
• Jan 16 2012
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L. Barnes
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, James Cloos
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L. Barnes
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Lawrence Conroy
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L. Barnes
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Lawrence Conroy
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L. Barnes
• Re: [dane] EFF's Sovereign Keys, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Paul Hoffman
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Paul Hoffman
• [dane] EFF's Sovereign Keys, DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA
• Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Miek Gieben
• Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Jan 14 2012
• Re: [dane] Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: therightkey, Yoav Nir
• Jan 13 2012
• Re: [dane] Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: therightkey, =JeffH
• [dane] Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: therightkey, Stephen Farrell
• [dane] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2012, Richard Clayton
• Jan 11 2012
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Suresh Krishnaswamy
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Martin Rex
• Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Paul Hoffman