dane Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [dane List Information]

Feb 22 2012

Re: [dane] WGLC reminder., Marco Davids (SIDN)
[dane] WGLC reminder., Warren Kumari

Feb 21 2012

Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Mark Andrews
Re: [dane] Security of DNSSEC, Andrew Sullivan
Re: [dane] Security of DNSSEC, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Security of DNSSEC, Andrew Sullivan
Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Andrew Sullivan
Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Security of DNSSEC, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Security of DNSSEC, Martin Rex

Feb 20 2012

Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, OndÅej SurÃ
Re: [dane] Record creators and MUST? And TLSA protocol name., Paul Hoffman

Feb 17 2012

Re: [dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, James Cloos
Re: [dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, Scott Schmit
Re: [dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, Andrew Sullivan
Re: [dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, James Cloos

Feb 16 2012

Re: [dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, Andrew Sullivan
Re: [dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, James Cloos
Re: [dane] Security of DNSSEC, Andrew Sullivan
Re: [dane] Getting rid of usage type 2, James Cloos
Re: [dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, Andrew Sullivan
Re: [dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Andrew Sullivan
[dane] Security of DNSSEC, Paul Hoffman
[dane] Forcing TLSA immediately, Paul Hoffman
[dane] End of TTL during TLS setup, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Getting rid of usage type 2, Pieter Lexis
[dane] Review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16, Andrew Sullivan
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] "First" request TLSA records?, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Getting rid of usage type 2, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Getting rid of usage type 2, John Gilmore
Re: [dane] Getting rid of usage type 2, Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] Certificate Usages (nits), Paul Hoffman
[dane] Getting rid of usage type 2, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Certificate Usages, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] DANE deployment document?, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Record creators and MUST? And TLSA protocol name., Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] Record creators and MUST? And TLSA protocol name., Bill Owens
Re: [dane] DANE deployment document?, Bill Owens
[dane] Record creators and MUST? And TLSA protocol name., John Gilmore
[dane] "First" request TLSA records?, John Gilmore
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Matthijs Mekking
[dane] Certificate Usages (nits), John Gilmore
[dane] Certificate Usages, John Gilmore
Re: [dane] DANE deployment document?, John Gilmore

Feb 15 2012

Re: [dane] dane-protocol-16 lacks real introductions, John Gilmore
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Deduplicate usage semantics and put semantics in 4 instead of 2.1.1, Richard Barnes
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Matthijs Mekking
[dane] Deduplicate usage semantics and put semantics in 4 instead of 2.1.1, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] DANE deployment document?, Paul Hoffman
[dane] DANE deployment document?, Bill Owens
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Matthijs Mekking

Feb 14 2012

Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Richard Barnes
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] dane-protocol-16 lacks real introductions, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Hash specs, and examples in sec. 2.3, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Hash specs, and examples in sec. 2.3, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Sean Leonard
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Sean Leonard
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Richard L. Barnes
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] Hash specs, and examples in sec. 2.3, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Richard L. Barnes
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Richard L. Barnes

Feb 13 2012

Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, John Gilmore
Re: [dane] Hash specs, and examples in sec. 2.3, Pieter Lexis
[dane] Hash specs, and examples in sec. 2.3, John Gilmore
[dane] dane-protocol-16 comments on Sec 1 to 2.1.4, John Gilmore
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., James Cloos
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Ondrej Mikle
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., W.C.A. Wijngaards

Feb 12 2012

Re: [dane] dane-protocol-16 lacks real introductions, bert hubert
Re: [dane] dane-protocol-16 lacks real introductions, John Gilmore
Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, Paul Wouters
Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, Paul Wouters
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Ondrej Mikle
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Stephen Farrell
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Ondrej Mikle
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Ondrej Mikle
Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, Bill Owens

Feb 11 2012

Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, John Gilmore
Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, Bill Owens
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Sean Leonard
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Stephen Farrell
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] dane-protocol-16 lacks real introductions, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] dane-protocol-16 lacks real introductions, John Gilmore
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, Richard L. Barnes
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Richard L. Barnes
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Richard L. Barnes
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Tom Ritter
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Tom Ritter
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Ondrej Mikle
Re: [dane] Security considerations for proxies, Tom Ritter

Feb 10 2012

Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, James Cloos
[dane] Security considerations for proxies, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, Bill Owens
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, Ilari Liusvaara
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, Bill Owens
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Olafur Gudmundsson
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., James Cloos
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Ondrej Mikle

Feb 09 2012

Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Ondrej Mikle
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., James Cloos
Re: [dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Olafur Gudmundsson
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Zack Weinberg
[dane] WG Last Call item: PKIX validation, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, Pieter Lexis

Feb 08 2012

Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, Zack Weinberg
[dane] Starting WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16., Warren Kumari
[dane] The missing section, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, James Cloos
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, Peter Palfrader
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, Paul Hoffman
[dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt, internet-drafts
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Bill Owens

Feb 07 2012

Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Warren Kumari
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Scott Schmit

Feb 06 2012

Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Scott Schmit

Feb 05 2012

Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Bill Owens

Feb 04 2012

Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, James Cloos
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Pieter Lexis
[dane] Draft 15 test page, James Cloos
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Peter Palfrader
[dane] swede updated to reflect changes introduced in draft 15, Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Jakob Schlyter
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, Jakob Schlyter
[dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt, internet-drafts

Feb 03 2012

Re: [dane] Specifying the certificate encoding in the spec, Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] Specifying the certificate encoding in the spec, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Specifying the certificate encoding in the spec, Richard L. Barnes
Re: [dane] Specifying the certificate encoding in the spec, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Specifying the certificate encoding in the spec, Richard L. Barnes
[dane] Specifying the certificate encoding in the spec, Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] #37: Additive assertion of server certificate, dane issue tracker
Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., OndÅej SurÃ

Feb 02 2012

Re: [dane] #28: Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, dane issue tracker
Re: [dane] 5280 section 6 and DANE usage etc., Stephen Farrell
Re: [dane] 5280 section 6 and DANE usage etc., Ilari Liusvaara
[dane] 5280 section 6 and DANE usage etc., Stephen Farrell
Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] simple key management, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., James Cloos
Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Jakob Schlyter
Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Scott Schmit
Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., OndÅej SurÃ
Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Matt McCutchen
Re: [dane] simple key management, Scott Schmit

Feb 01 2012

Re: [dane] simple key management, Stephen Farrell
Re: [dane] simple key management (was: issue #37 I think), Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] simple key management (was: issue #37 I think), Paul Hoffman
[dane] simple key management (was: issue #37 I think), Stephen Farrell

Jan 31 2012

Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., James Cloos
Re: [dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., Tom Ritter
[dane] Call for last comments on issue #37., OndÅej SurÃ
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., OndÅej SurÃ

Jan 28 2012

Re: [dane] Comments on draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Jakob Schlyter
[dane] Closing issue #28, Paul Hoffman

Jan 27 2012

Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Warren Kumari
Re: [dane] Comments on draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Zack Weinberg
[dane] Comments on draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Bill Owens

Jan 26 2012

Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section A.2.1.1. (draft 14), Andrew Sullivan
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Matt Miller
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Matt Miller
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section A.2.1.1. (draft 14), Scott Schmit
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Stephen Farrell
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Scott Schmit
Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section A.2.1.1. (draft 14), James Cloos
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., OndÅej SurÃ
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., OndÅej SurÃ
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, OndÅej SurÃ
Re: [dane] Does the WG want to meet in Paris?, OndÅej SurÃ
Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section, OndÅej SurÃ
Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section, Jakob Schlyter
Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section A.2.1.1. (draft 14), Jakob Schlyter
Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section A.2.1.1. (draft 14), Scott Schmit
Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Warren Kumari
Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Warren Kumari
Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section, Martin Rex

Jan 25 2012

Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section, Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section, bert hubert
Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section A.2.1.1., Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section A.2.1.1. (draft 14), Jakob Schlyter
[dane] Impossible situation in the last example of section A.2.1.1. (draft 14), Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Scott Schmit
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Ondrej Mikle
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] Specifying a new trust anchor, Matt McCutchen
Re: [dane] Specifying a new trust anchor, Matt McCutchen
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Matt McCutchen
Re: [dane] Specifying a new trust anchor, Scott Schmit

Jan 24 2012

Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Specifying a new trust anchor, Martin Rex
[dane] Specifying a new trust anchor, Paul Hoffman
[dane] DANE ad RFC 2818, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] New "operational considerations" text (was: Addition to "Security considerations"), Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] New "operational considerations" text (was: Addition to "Security considerations"), Ondrej Mikle
Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, James Cloos
Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, dane
Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Jerry Lundström
Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Paul Wouters
Re: [dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Scott Schmit
[dane] Announcing the alpha release of swede - A tool to create and verify TLSA records, Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Jim Schaad
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Matt McCutchen
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Jim Schaad
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Jim Schaad
Re: [dane] New "operational considerations" text (was: Addition to "Security considerations"), Jim Schaad
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Matt McCutchen
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Warren Kumari
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Ondrej Mikle

Jan 23 2012

Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] New "operational considerations" text (was: Addition to "Security considerations"), Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Ondrej Mikle
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] #35: Behavior for a supported algorithm that is not considered "strong" by the client., dane issue tracker
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #35 - Behavior for a supported algorithm that is not considered "strong" by the client., Warren Kumari
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Ondrej Mikle
Re: [dane] New "operational considerations" text (was: Addition to "Security considerations"), Ondrej Mikle
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Question regarding draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Paul Wouters
Re: [dane] Question regarding draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Richard L. Barnes
Re: [dane] Question regarding draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Matt McCutchen
Re: [dane] Question regarding draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Scott Schmit
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #37., Matt McCutchen

Jan 22 2012

Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, James Cloos
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Scott Schmit
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, James Cloos
Re: [dane] Question regarding draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Pieter . Lexis
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Scott Schmit
Re: [dane] Question regarding draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Scott Schmit
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Question regarding draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Question regarding draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Scott Schmit
Re: [dane] existence proof, Simon Arlott
[dane] Question regarding draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: [dane] existence proof, Tom Ritter
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Scott Schmit

Jan 21 2012

Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Mark Andrews
Re: [dane] existence proof, Scott Schmit
Re: [dane] Proposed text for A.4 Handling Certificate Rollover, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Scott Schmit
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Scott Schmit

Jan 20 2012

Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Matt Miller
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L. Barnes
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L. Barnes
Re: [dane] Questions about the current draft (14), Richard L. Barnes
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Warren Kumari
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Mark Andrews
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman

Jan 19 2012

Re: [dane] Questions about the current draft (14), Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Questions about the current draft (14), Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] Questions about the current draft (14), Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Questions about the current draft (14), Paul Hoffman
[dane] Questions about the current draft (14), Pieter Lexis

Jan 18 2012

Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, OndÅej SurÃ
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Mark Andrews
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Mark Andrews
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, James Cloos
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, James Cloos
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Mark Andrews
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L. Barnes
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Lawrence Conroy

Jan 17 2012

Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Matt Miller
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Jakob Schlyter
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Olafur Gudmundsson
[dane] existence proof, bmanning
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L. Barnes
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L . Barnes
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, OndÅej SurÃ
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Mark Andrews
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Mark Andrews
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Tony Finch
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Tony Finch
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, James Cloos
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, James Cloos

Jan 16 2012

Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L. Barnes
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, James Cloos
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L. Barnes
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Olafur Gudmundsson
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Lawrence Conroy
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L. Barnes
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Lawrence Conroy
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L. Barnes
Re: [dane] EFF's Sovereign Keys, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Paul Hoffman
[dane] EFF's Sovereign Keys, DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Miek Gieben
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer

Jan 14 2012

Re: [dane] Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: therightkey, Yoav Nir

Jan 13 2012

Re: [dane] Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: therightkey, =JeffH
[dane] Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: therightkey, Stephen Farrell
[dane] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2012, Richard Clayton

Jan 11 2012

Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Suresh Krishnaswamy
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Peter Sylvester
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Suresh Krishnaswamy
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Olafur Gudmundsson
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Olle E. Johansson
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Olle E. Johansson
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Jakob Schlyter
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Jakob Schlyter
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L . Barnes
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Martin Rex

Jan 10 2012

Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, James Cloos
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Jakob Schlyter
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #35 - Behavior for a supported algorithm that is not considered "strong" by the client., Warren Kumari
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L. Barnes
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, OndÅej SurÃ
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #35 - Behavior for a supported algorithm that is not considered "strong" by the client., OndÅej SurÃ
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Pieter Lexis
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Jakob Schlyter
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Stephane Bortzmeyer

Jan 09 2012

Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Ondrej Mikle
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, James Cloos
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, SM
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Matt Miller
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L. Barnes
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #35 - Behavior for a supported algorithm that is not considered "strong" by the client., Olafur Gudmundsson
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Richard L. Barnes
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Jakob Schlyter
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Peter Koch
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, bmanning
Re: [dane] Opening Issue #35 - Behavior for a supported algorithm that is not considered "strong" by the client., Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Paul Hoffman
[dane] Opening Issue #35 - Behavior for a supported algorithm that is not considered "strong" by the client., Warren Kumari
[dane] Opening issue #28 - Interaction of SRV and TLSA records, Warren Kumari
Re: [dane] #6: Downgrade attacks : What to do if DANE fails, dane issue tracker

Jan 08 2012

[dane] Opening Issue #37., Warren Kumari
[dane] Does the WG want to meet in Paris?, Warren Kumari

Jan 05 2012

Re: [dane] #10: Considerations related to the comprimise of an intermediate CA, dane issue tracker
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Ondrej Mikle
Re: [dane] #8: How do we handle the "Last Hop Problem", dane issue tracker
Re: [dane] #38: Dane and EAP-FAST, dane issue tracker
Re: [dane] #23: Asserting DANE exclusivity for an entire domain, dane issue tracker
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, James Cloos
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] Pseudocode review, Stephane Bortzmeyer

Jan 04 2012

[dane] Pseudocode review, Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Jakob Schlyter
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Ilari Liusvaara
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, Jakob Schlyter
[dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt, internet-drafts

Dec 28 2011

Re: [dane] New "operational considerations" text (was: Addition to "Security considerations"), Jim Schaad

Dec 26 2011

Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-13.txt, Paul Wouters

Dec 26 2011

Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-13.txt, Warren Kumari

Dec 24 2011

Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-13.txt, Paul Hoffman

Dec 24 2011

Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-13.txt, Scott Schmit

Dec 21 2011

Re: [dane] (Belated) Resolutions from Taipei., Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] (Belated) Resolutions from Taipei., Jakob Schlyter

Dec 20 2011

Re: [dane] (Belated) Resolutions from Taipei., Warren Kumari
Re: [dane] (Belated) Resolutions from Taipei., Paul Hoffman
Re: [dane] (Belated) Resolutions from Taipei., Zack Weinberg
[dane] (Belated) Resolutions from Taipei., Warren Kumari

Dec 19 2011

Re: [dane] Posted draft -13, Zack Weinberg
[dane] Posted draft -13, Paul Hoffman
[dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-13.txt, internet-drafts

Dec 18 2011

[dane] New "operational considerations" text (was: Addition to "Security considerations"), Ondrej Mikle

Dec 15 2011

Re: [dane] #36: Only requiring DNSSEC where it is needed, dane issue tracker

Dec 12 2011

Re: [dane] Addition to "Security considerations" section -, Jim Schaad

Dec 12 2011

Re: [dane] Addition to "Security considerations" section -, Ondrej Mikle

Dec 09 2011

Re: [dane] Addition to "Security considerations" section -, Martin Rex

Dec 08 2011

Re: [dane] Addition to "Security considerations" section -, Jim Schaad

Dec 07 2011

Re: [dane] Addition to "Security considerations" section -, Ondrej Mikle
Re: [dane] Call for DNSSEC validation states ending soon (Was: RFC2119 MAY (Was: Call for consensus on level of DNSSEC support)), Scott Schmit

Dec 06 2011

Dec 04 2011

Dec 03 2011

Dec 02 2011

Re: [dane] fixing DNSSEC problems that are out of scope for DANE, Tony Finch
Re: [dane] fixing DNSSEC problems that are out of scope for DANE, Krishnaswamy, Suresh
Re: [dane] Call for consensus on level of DNSSEC support, Scott Schmit
Re: [dane] Call for consensus on level of DNSSEC support, Mark Andrews
Re: [dane] Call for consensus on level of DNSSEC support, Scott Schmit
Re: [dane] Call for consensus on level of DNSSEC support, Scott Schmit
Re: [dane] fixing DNSSEC problems that are out of scope for DANE, Mark Andrews
Re: [dane] fixing DNSSEC problems that are out of scope for DANE, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Call for consensus on level of DNSSEC support, John Gilmore
Re: [dane] Call for consensus on level of DNSSEC support, Tony Finch
Re: [dane] Addition to "Security considerations" section - usage type 0 with SubjectPublicKeyInfo selector, Ondrej Mikle

Dec 01 2011

Re: [dane] Call for consensus on level of DNSSEC support, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] Call for consensus on level of DNSSEC support, Zack Weinberg
Re: [dane] Call for consensus on level of DNSSEC support, Martin Rex
Re: [dane] fixing DNSSEC problems that are out of scope for DANE, Andrew Sullivan
Re: [dane] Call for consensus on level of DNSSEC support, Andrew Sullivan

Mail converted by MHonArc