dane Discussion Archive - Thread Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [dane List Information]

• [dane] draft-fanf-dane-smtp, Tony Finch
  • Re: [dane] draft-fanf-dane-smtp, Ned Freed
    • Re: [dane] draft-fanf-dane-smtp, Tony Finch
    • Re: [dane] draft-fanf-dane-smtp, Warren Kumari
    • Re: [dane] draft-fanf-dane-smtp, Richard L. Barnes
      • Re: [dane] draft-fanf-dane-smtp, Tony Finch
      • Re: [dane] draft-fanf-dane-smtp, Ned Freed
  • Re: [dane] draft-fanf-dane-smtp, James Cloos
    • Re: [dane] draft-fanf-dane-smtp, Scott Schmit
• [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-21.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol: TLSA) to Proposed Standard, The IESG
  • [dane] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-21.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol: TLSA) to Proposed Standard, Stephen Farrell
• [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-21.txt, internet-drafts
• [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
  • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Nicholas Weaver
  • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Hoffman
    • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Nicholas Weaver
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Nicholas Weaver
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Nicholas Weaver
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Tom Ritter
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Warren Kumari
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Adam Langley
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Ondrej Mikle
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Adam Langley
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Tony Finch
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Ondrej Mikle
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Tony Finch
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Ondrej Mikle
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Yoav Nir
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Tony Finch
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Tony Finch
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Scott Schmit
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, John Gilmore
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Nicholas Weaver
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Yoav Nir
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Nicholas Weaver
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Warren Kumari
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Nicholas Weaver
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Nicholas Weaver
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Nicholas Weaver
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Nicholas Weaver
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, John Gilmore
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Yoav Nir
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Wouters
    • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
  • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Hoffman
    • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Warren Kumari
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Mark Andrews
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Warren Kumari
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Nicholas Weaver
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Warren Kumari
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Warren Kumari
    • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
      • [dane] Network errors ARE attacks - on the end-to-end-principle, John Gilmore
      • Re: [dane] Network errors ARE attacks - on the end-to-end-principle, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] Network errors ARE attacks - on the end-to-end-principle, Yoav Nir
      • Re: [dane] Network errors ARE attacks - on the end-to-end-principle, Henry Story
      • Re: [dane] Network errors ARE attacks - on the end-to-end-principle, SM
      • Re: [dane] Network errors ARE attacks - on the end-to-end-principle, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      • Re: [dane] Network errors ARE attacks - on the end-to-end-principle, Henry Story
      • Re: [dane] Network errors ARE attacks - on the end-to-end-principle, Michael Richardson
      • Re: [dane] Network errors ARE attacks - on the end-to-end-principle, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Network errors ARE attacks - on the end-to-end-principle, Mark Andrews
      • Re: [dane] Network errors ARE attacks - on the end-to-end-principle, Warren Kumari
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Nicholas Weaver
    • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, John Gilmore
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, John Gilmore
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?, Paul Wouters
• [dane] Fwd: [apps-discuss] DANE IETF LC state of play, Paul Hoffman
• [dane] Question re draft -20, TLSA record expiry, Thierry Moreau
• [dane] DANE IETF LC state of play, Stephen Farrell
  • Re: [dane] DANE IETF LC state of play, Marc Lampo
    • Re: [dane] DANE IETF LC state of play, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] DANE IETF LC state of play, Marc Lampo
      • Re: [dane] DANE IETF LC state of play, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] DANE IETF LC state of play, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] DANE IETF LC state of play, Warren Kumari
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [dane] DANE IETF LC state of play, Marc Lampo
• [dane] Draft -20, Paul Hoffman
  • Re: [dane] Draft -20, Warren Kumari
    • Re: [dane] Draft -20, Scott Schmit
• [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-20.txt, internet-drafts
• [dane] Fwd: SecDir Review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Paul Hoffman
  • Re: [dane] Fwd: SecDir Review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Paul Wouters
    • Re: [dane] Fwd: SecDir Review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Tony Finch
    • Re: [dane] Fwd: SecDir Review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      • Re: [dane] Fwd: SecDir Review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Andrew Sullivan
  • Re: [dane] Fwd: SecDir Review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Mark Andrews
• Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt>, =JeffH
• Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> - Referring to the DANE protocol and DANE-denoted certificate associations, =JeffH
  • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> - Referring to the DANE protocol and DANE-denoted certificate associations, Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Peter Saint-Andre
  • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Paul Hoffman
    • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Warren Kumari
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Peter Saint-Andre
    • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Peter Saint-Andre
  • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Peter Saint-Andre
    • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Scott Schmit
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Peter Saint-Andre
      • [dane] Terminology 'whitespace' (Was: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19), OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] Terminology 'whitespace' (Was: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19), Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: [dane] Terminology 'whitespace' (Was: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19), Mark Andrews
    • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, SM
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, SM
    • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Tony Finch
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Warren Kumari
      • [dane] Client-defined port -> particular port (was: [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19), OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Tony Finch
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Alexey Melnikov
    • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Alexey Melnikov
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Ned Freed
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of, Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of, Tony Finch
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of, Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of, SM
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Andrew Sullivan
    • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Mark Andrews
    • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, John Gilmore
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, John Gilmore
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, James Cloos
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Matt Miller
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, James Cloos
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Matt Miller
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Paul Hoffman
      • [dane] Documenting DANE for XMPP (WAS: [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19), Matt Miller
      • Re: [dane] Documenting DANE for XMPP (WAS: [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19), Richard L. Barnes
      • Re: [dane] [xmpp] Documenting DANE for XMPP (WAS: [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19), Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Dave Cridland
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Tony Finch
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Tony Finch
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, James Cloos
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Warren Kumari
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Mark Andrews
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Patrik Fältström
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, James Cloos
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Ned Freed
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, James Cloos
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Ned Freed
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Stephen Farrell
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Ned Freed
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Stephen Farrell
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Ned Freed
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Stephen Farrell
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Ned Freed
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Ned Freed
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Stephen Farrell
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Ned Freed
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss], Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss], Ned Freed
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss], Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss], Ned Freed
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss], Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss], Ned Freed
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Scott Schmit
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Tony Finch
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Ned Freed
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Mark Andrews
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Tony Finch
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of, Mark Andrews
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of, Tony Finch
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of, Mark Andrews
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, James Cloos
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Tony Finch
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Ned Freed
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, SM
      • Re: [dane] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, S Moonesamy
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Tony Finch
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Tony Finch
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Tony Finch
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Mark Andrews
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Jakob Schlyter
      • [dane] MX and DANE (Was: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19), OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] MX and DANE (Was: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19), Richard L. Barnes
      • Re: [dane] MX and DANE (Was: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19), Tony Finch
      • Re: [dane] MX and DANE (Was: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19), OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] MX and DANE (Was: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19), Mark Andrews
      • Re: [dane] MX and DANE (Was: AppsDir review of, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Alexey Melnikov
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, James Cloos
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Alexey Melnikov
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19, Paul Hoffman
• [dane] Referring to the DANE protocol and DANE-denoted certificate associations, =JeffH
  • Re: [dane] Referring to the DANE protocol and DANE-denoted certificate associations, Paul Hoffman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [dane] Referring to the DANE protocol and DANE-denoted certificate associations, =JeffH
    • Re: [dane] Referring to the DANE protocol and DANE-denoted certificate associations, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] Referring to the DANE protocol and DANE-denoted certificate associations, John Gilmore
      • Re: [dane] Referring to the DANE protocol and DANE-denoted certificate associations, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] Referring to the DANE protocol and DANE-denoted certificate associations, Warren Kumari
  • Re: [dane] Referring to the DANE protocol and DANE-denoted certificate associations, =JeffH
    • Re: [dane] Referring to the DANE protocol and DANE-denoted certificate associations, OndÅej SurÃ
  • Re: [dane] Referring to the DANE protocol and DANE-denoted certificate associations, =JeffH
  • Re: [dane] Referring to the DANE protocol and DANE-denoted certificate associations, =JeffH
• [dane] Possible ambiguity in -19, Andrew Sullivan
  • Re: [dane] Possible ambiguity in -19, Paul Wouters
  • Re: [dane] Possible ambiguity in -19, Paul Hoffman
    • Re: [dane] Possible ambiguity in -19, OndÅej SurÃ
• [dane] antique signer?, bmanning
  • Re: [dane] antique signer?, Mark Andrews
    • Re: [dane] antique signer?, bmanning
• [dane] #40: Which TLS versions?, dane issue tracker
  • Re: [dane] #40: Which TLS versions?, OndÅej SurÃ
  • Re: [dane] #40: Which TLS versions?, dane issue tracker
  • Re: [dane] #40: Which TLS versions?, dane issue tracker
• [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, John Gilmore
  • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, Stephen Farrell
  • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, OndÅej SurÃ
    • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, OndÅej SurÃ
    • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, Scott Schmit
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, Jim Schaad
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, James Cloos
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, Stephen Farrell
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, John Gilmore
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, Scott Schmit
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, Scott Schmit
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, Ben Laurie
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, Scott Schmit
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, Ben Laurie
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, Scott Schmit
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, Ben Laurie
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, Ben Laurie
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, Scott Schmit
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, Scott Schmit
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, Scott Schmit
      • Re: [dane] Inappropriate Section 8 of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, John Gilmore
• [dane] draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt typos and minor fixes, John Gilmore
  • Re: [dane] draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt typos and minor fixes, SM
    • Re: [dane] draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt typos and minor fixes, James Cloos
      • Re: [dane] draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt typos and minor fixes, SM
      • Re: [dane] draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt typos and minor fixes, James Cloos
      • Re: [dane] draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt typos and minor fixes, Mark Andrews
      • Re: [dane] draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt typos and minor fixes, Mark Andrews
      • Re: [dane] draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt typos and minor fixes, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt typos and minor fixes, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt typos and minor fixes, Mark Andrews
      • Re: [dane] draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt typos and minor fixes, Andrew Sullivan
  • Re: [dane] draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt typos and minor fixes, Frederico A C Neves
    • [dane] TLSA == RRtype 52, Olafur Gudmundsson
      • Re: [dane] TLSA == RRtype 52, Warren Kumari
      • Re: [dane] TLSA == RRtype 52, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] TLSA == RRtype 52, Olafur Gudmundsson
      • Re: [dane] TLSA == RRtype 52, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] TLSA == RRtype 52, Olafur Gudmundsson
      • Re: [dane] TLSA == RRtype 52, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] TLSA == RRtype 52, Olafur Gudmundsson
      • Re: [dane] TLSA == RRtype 52, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] TLSA == RRtype 52, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] TLSA == RRtype 52, bert hubert
      • Re: [dane] TLSA == RRtype 52, Paul Hoffman
  • [dane] Appendix A.1 - Certificate Usage 0 only (Re: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt typos and minor fixes), OndÅej SurÃ
    • Re: [dane] Appendix A.1 - Certificate Usage 0 only (Re: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt typos and minor fixes), OndÅej SurÃ
• [dane] #39: Address interaction between EV certs and DANE, dane issue tracker
  • Re: [dane] #39: Address interaction between EV certs and DANE, John Gilmore
    • Re: [dane] #39: Address interaction between EV certs and DANE, Tom Ritter
      • Re: [dane] #39: Address interaction between EV certs and DANE, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] #39: Address interaction between EV certs and DANE, Tom Ritter
    • Re: [dane] #39: Address interaction between EV certs and DANE, Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: [dane] #39: Address interaction between EV certs and DANE, dane issue tracker
• [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, The IESG
  • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, SM
    • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, SM
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, John Gilmore
    • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Peter Palfrader
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Ned Freed
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Martin Rex
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Ned Freed
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      • Message not available
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, SM
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, SM
    • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, John Gilmore
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, SM
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, SM
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews
      • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, James Cloos
    • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The, Martin Rex
• [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt, internet-drafts
• [dane] Fwd: [dnsext] TLSA RRTYPE review - result [IANA #550878], Paul Hoffman
• [dane] FW: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-18, Murray S. Kucherawy
• [dane] base64 vs base64url, Stephen Farrell
  • Re: [dane] base64 vs base64url, James Cloos
    • Re: [dane] base64 vs base64url, Stephen Farrell
• [dane] Fwd: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-18, Paul Hoffman
  • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-18, Paul Hoffman
    • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-18, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-18, Lawrence Conroy
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-18, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-18, Murray S. Kucherawy
    • Re: [dane] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-18, Murray S. Kucherawy
    • Re: [dane] AppsDir review: SHOULD on hash algs, John Gilmore
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review: SHOULD on hash algs, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: [dane] AppsDir review: SHOULD on hash algs, Martin Rex
• [dane] US FCC CSRIC recommends DNSSEC, US ISPs agree to deploy it, John Gilmore
  • Re: [dane] US FCC CSRIC recommends DNSSEC, US ISPs agree to deploy it, Warren Kumari
• [dane] Pseudocode in -18 for usage certificate usage 2 incorrect, Ondrej Mikle
  • Re: [dane] Pseudocode in -18 for usage certificate usage 2 incorrect, Jim Schaad
• [dane] Security consideration "local policy" distrusting usages 2 and 3, John Gilmore
  • Re: [dane] Security consideration "local policy" distrusting usages 2 and 3, Jim Schaad
    • Re: [dane] Security consideration "local policy" distrusting usages 2 and 3, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] Security consideration "local policy" distrusting usages 2 and 3, John Gilmore
      • Re: [dane] Security consideration "local policy" distrusting usages 2 and 3, Jim Schaad
• [dane] Typo in -18: nane, John Gilmore
• [dane] AD review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-18, Stephen Farrell
  • Re: [dane] AD review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-18, Paul Hoffman
    • Re: [dane] AD review of draft-ietf-dane-protocol-18, Stephen Farrell
  • [dane] 1: Q for 1.3, Paul Hoffman
    • Re: [dane] 1: Q for 1.3, OndÅej SurÃ
  • [dane] 2: Usage 0 clarity, Paul Hoffman
    • Re: [dane] 2: Usage 0 clarity, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] 2: Usage 0 clarity, Jim Schaad
      • Re: [dane] 2: Usage 0 clarity, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] 2: Usage 0 clarity, Jim Schaad
      • Re: [dane] 2: Usage 0 clarity, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] 2: Usage 0 clarity, Martin Rex
  • [dane] 3: SHA-384, Paul Hoffman
    • Re: [dane] 3: SHA-384, John Gilmore
      • Re: [dane] 3: SHA-384, Stephen Farrell
      • Re: [dane] 3: SHA-384, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] 3: SHA-384, Martin Rex
  • [dane] 4: Length of certificate association data field, Paul Hoffman
    • Re: [dane] 4: Length of certificate association data field, Jim Schaad
      • Re: [dane] 4: Length of certificate association data field, Stephen Farrell
      • Re: [dane] 4: Length of certificate association data field, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] 4: Length of certificate association data field, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] 4: Length of certificate association data field, John Gilmore
      • Re: [dane] 4: Length of certificate association data field, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] 4: Length of certificate association data field, John Gilmore
  • [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, Paul Hoffman
    • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, Ben Wilson
    • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, Stephen Farrell
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, Jim Fenton
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, Stephen Farrell
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, Stephen Kent
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, Stephen Kent
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute: replacement text, John Gilmore
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute: replacement text, Paul Wouters
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, Warren Kumari
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, Stephen Kent
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, John Gilmore
      • Re: [dane] subverted websites, John Gilmore
      • Re: [dane] subverted websites, Pieter Lexis
      • Re: [dane] subverted websites, Stephen Kent
      • Re: [dane] subverted websites, John Gilmore
      • Re: [dane] subverted websites, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, Tony Finch
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, Rick Andrews
      • Re: [dane] 5: PKI disrepute, Tony Finch
  • [dane] 6: No matching associations, Paul Hoffman
    • Re: [dane] 6: No matching associations, Jim Schaad
      • Re: [dane] 6: No matching associations, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [dane] 6: No matching associations, OndÅej SurÃ
      • Re: [dane] 6: No matching associations, Jim Schaad
  • [dane] 7: Extra vulnerability of #3, Paul Hoffman
    • Re: [dane] 7: Extra vulnerability of #3, OndÅej SurÃ
• [dane] TLSA RRTYPE allocation?, James Cloos
  • Re: [dane] TLSA RRTYPE allocation?, Paul Hoffman
    • Re: [dane] TLSA RRTYPE allocation?, James Cloos
      • Re: [dane] TLSA RRTYPE allocation?, Warren Kumari
• [dane] Publication requested for draft-ietf-dane-protocol-18, Warren Kumari