Re: [dccp] Would a DCCP flow need to send 2x its preferred rate?

[Qiaobing Xie <Qiaobing.Xie@motorola.com>]

> ....
> And during a silent period, the TFRC flow would have to transmit something
> so it wasn't crowded out entirely.  But this amount would be *half* the
> nominal rate, or perhaps less.  Not twice.

This may be an encouragement to the codec folks in the future to stop doing
silence detection since it would be better to always have something to send.
But, if people suddenly realize that turning off their encoder silence
detection immediately gives them better voice quality and start to do so in a
large scale, what good it would do to the network? Would IAB have the power to
tell people not to do so?

regards,
-Qiaobing


>
>
> Eddie
>
> _______________________________________________
> dccp IETF mailing list: dccp@ietf.org
> list info:  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dccp
> wg charter: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/dccp-charter.html


_______________________________________________
dccp IETF mailing list: dccp@ietf.org
list info:  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dccp
wg charter: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/dccp-charter.html