Re: [dccp] status of available DCCP implementations?

[Ian McDonald <iam4 at cs.waikato.ac.nz>]

Hi there Yoshifumi,

I haven't seen a reply on list to this but Joacim seems to be working on
much the same area as you, so you may wish to discuss this with him how
to co-operate.

Regards,

Ian

Yoshifumi Nishida wrote:
> Hi, Sorry for my slow reply. I have been working on the DCCP
> implementation in KAME cvs repository as my hobby, which is based on the
> FreeBSD implementation from http://www.freebsd.dccp.org/
> The code is still very preliminary and it supports only CCID2 so far.
> But, at least it seems to work on netbsd kame implementation. 
> 
> If you could test the code and give me any comments, I would be 
> grateful much. I also made a tiny patch for etheread-0.10.11.
> This patch is based on http://www.ludd.luth.se/~joacim/ethereal_0.9.11_dccp.patch
> and is modified to meet the current spec.
> 
> For detailed information, please see http://www.jp.nishida.org/dccp/dccp.html
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> Yoshifumi Nishida
> nishida at csl.sony.co.jp
> 
> 
> 
> From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert at netlab.nec.de>
> Subject: [dccp] status of available DCCP implementations?
> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:59:28 +0200
> Message-ID: <93E76AFE-A6A2-4D9A-BC14-8791BD8C9307 at netlab.nec.de>
> 
>  > Hi,
>  > 
>  > now that the DCCP base spec and profiles have solidified, it may be  
>  > interesting to gain some more experimental experience with DCCP. If  
>  > you have implemented DCCP, are implementing it or plan on  
>  > implementing it, we'd like to hear from you!
>  > 
>  > Specifically, we'd like to know about:
>  > 
>  > - state of the implementation
>  >     - version(s) of the draft(s) implemented
>  >     - if you don't implement the latest yet, do you plan on doing so?
>  >     - unsupported features - anything you plan on leaving unsupported?
>  > 
>  > - availability
>  >     - license
>  >     - platform
>  >     - planned release date if not released
>  > 
>  > - lessons learned
>  >     - experimental/performance results
>  >     - API issues
>  >     - application behavior/compatibility
>  > 
>  > - interest in participating in an eventual interop event
>  > 
>  > Thanks,
>  > Lars
>  > -- 
>  > Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories
>  > 
>