Re: [dccp] status of available DCCP implementations?

[Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida at csl.sony.co.jp>]

Hi Ian,
Yes, it would be great if we can work together or exchange info.

Thanks,
--
Yoshifumi Nishida
nishida at csl.sony.co.jp

  
From: Ian McDonald <iam4 at cs.waikato.ac.nz>
Subject: Re: [dccp] status of available DCCP implementations?
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 15:33:36 +1200
Message-ID: <42ED9810.80400 at cs.waikato.ac.nz>

 > Hi there Yoshifumi,
 > 
 > I haven't seen a reply on list to this but Joacim seems to be working on
 > much the same area as you, so you may wish to discuss this with him how
 > to co-operate.
 > 
 > Regards,
 > 
 > Ian
 > 
 > Yoshifumi Nishida wrote:
 > > Hi, Sorry for my slow reply. I have been working on the DCCP
 > > implementation in KAME cvs repository as my hobby, which is based on the
 > > FreeBSD implementation from http://www.freebsd.dccp.org/
 > > The code is still very preliminary and it supports only CCID2 so far.
 > > But, at least it seems to work on netbsd kame implementation. 
 > > 
 > > If you could test the code and give me any comments, I would be 
 > > grateful much. I also made a tiny patch for etheread-0.10.11.
 > > This patch is based on http://www.ludd.luth.se/~joacim/ethereal_0.9.11_dccp.patch
 > > and is modified to meet the current spec.
 > > 
 > > For detailed information, please see http://www.jp.nishida.org/dccp/dccp.html
 > > 
 > > Thanks,
 > > --
 > > Yoshifumi Nishida
 > > nishida at csl.sony.co.jp
 > > 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert at netlab.nec.de>
 > > Subject: [dccp] status of available DCCP implementations?
 > > Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:59:28 +0200
 > > Message-ID: <93E76AFE-A6A2-4D9A-BC14-8791BD8C9307 at netlab.nec.de>
 > > 
 > >  > Hi,
 > >  > 
 > >  > now that the DCCP base spec and profiles have solidified, it may be  
 > >  > interesting to gain some more experimental experience with DCCP. If  
 > >  > you have implemented DCCP, are implementing it or plan on  
 > >  > implementing it, we'd like to hear from you!
 > >  > 
 > >  > Specifically, we'd like to know about:
 > >  > 
 > >  > - state of the implementation
 > >  >     - version(s) of the draft(s) implemented
 > >  >     - if you don't implement the latest yet, do you plan on doing so?
 > >  >     - unsupported features - anything you plan on leaving unsupported?
 > >  > 
 > >  > - availability
 > >  >     - license
 > >  >     - platform
 > >  >     - planned release date if not released
 > >  > 
 > >  > - lessons learned
 > >  >     - experimental/performance results
 > >  >     - API issues
 > >  >     - application behavior/compatibility
 > >  > 
 > >  > - interest in participating in an eventual interop event
 > >  > 
 > >  > Thanks,
 > >  > Lars
 > >  > -- 
 > >  > Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories
 > >  > 
 > > 
 >