RE: [dccp] HEADS UP: start of WGLC for -12 of the spec, ends Dec 1

["Phelan, Tom" <tphelan at sonusnet.com>]

Hi Lars,

I'd like to regard my thread on response to an invalid SC, and Eddie's
thread on SHOULD vs. MUST in the port registry as last call comments.
These threads haven't quite reached conclusion yet.

In the wildcard service code discussion, there's one point that could
lead to a change in the spec, and therefore should probably be tracked
as a last call issue.  That's whether or not to change "match", in the
language about using services codes to accept connections, to "equals".
The next time Eddie responds on this will probably close the issue.

Tom P.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Eggert [mailto:lars.eggert at netlab.nec.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 10:04 AM
> Cc: dccp group; Eddie Kohler; Phelan, Tom; Allison Mankin
> Subject: Re: [dccp] HEADS UP: start of WGLC for -12 of the spec, ends
> Dec 1
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Nov 24, 2005, at 10:06, Lars Eggert wrote:
> >
> > we'd like to begin WGLC for -12 of the spec, which contains 
> a small  
> > number of technical fixes compared to the -11 revision we  
> > originally passed on to the IESG.
> ...
> > *** Please send comments within 1 week, i.e., by Thur, Dec 
> 1, 2005.  
> > ***
> 
> due to the Thanksgiving Holiday and another glitch, this 
> draft hasn't  
> hit the ID repository yet.
> 
> If this is preventing anyone from commenting on this draft, please  
> let Tom and me know ASAP and we'll extend the deadline!
> 
> Otherwise, we'd still like to end WGLC on Thursday. (No comments  
> received so far.)
> 
> Thanks,
> Lars
> --
> Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network 
> Laboratories
> 
>