[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [dccp] HEADS UP: WGLC on draft-ietf-dccp-tfrc-voip-04.txt, ends 2006-2-18

Hi Sally,

I'd like to hear your thinking on new CCID or negotiated option, but I'm
with Lars on, at least naively, thinking that a new CCID would be a good
idea (chair hat off too).

Tom P.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Eggert [mailto:lars.eggert at netlab.nec.de]
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 3:41 AM
> To: Magnus Westerlund
> Cc: Sally Floyd; Eddie Kohler; dccp group; Phelan, Tom; Allison Mankin
> Subject: Re: [dccp] HEADS UP: WGLC on
draft-ietf-dccp-tfrc-voip-04.txt,
> ends 2006-2-18
> 
> On Feb 16, 2006, at 11:12, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> > Sally Floyd wrote:
> >> So this could be either a new CCID, or a negotiated variant of
CCID3.
> >> In terms of implementation, I think it makes more sense to think of
> >> it as a negotiated variant of CCID3, but in terms of API
interfaces,
> >> it is probably more straightforward to present it as a new CCID.
> >> Yes?  No?
> >
> > Isn't it easier to negotiate if it is given its own CCID? Using yet
> > another level of negotiation seems counter productive and may
> > increase the delay.
> 
> I also think a new CCID may be most appropriate.
> 
> (chair hat off)
> 
> Lars
> --
> Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network
Laboratories
>