[dccp] Re: spec nits

[Colin Perkins <csp at csperkins.org>]

On 7 Mar 2006, at 09:46, Lars Eggert wrote:
...
> PS: Good news from the RFC editor - the spec, both CCIDs and the  
> problem statement have just hit AUTH48.

One minor nit I noticed while updating the RTP-over-DCCP draft, which  
it might be possible to fix in AUTH48. Section 8.1.2 states:

    SC=     Indicates a decimal Service Code.  The octothorp is  
followed
            by any number of decimal digits, which specify the Service
            Code.  Values above 4294967294 are illegal.

but there is no octothorp in the syntax. Is the intent to specify  
"SC=#123456" or "SC=123456"?

Colin