Re: [dccp] Interest in WG adopting the I-Ds on ccid3-drops & ccid-4?

["Ian McDonald" <ian.mcdonald at jandi.co.nz>]

On 9/10/07, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry at erg.abdn.ac.uk> wrote:
> CCID-4 currently relies on CCID-3 (and, as I understand, CCID-3 loss),
> which in turn is built upon RFC3448...
>
> Your question of whether a new CCID-4 should include FR is interesting,
> since I can see there may be merit in building a "VoIP"-friendly CC
> scheme on the more recent 3448.bis and/or FR.
>
> I wonder what others think?
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Gorry
>
I already discussed this previously and Sally added this to the 01 draft:

5.1.  Response to Idle and Application-limited Periods

   This is described in Section 5.1 of [RFC4342].  If Faster Restart is
   standardized in the IETF for TFRC [KFS07], then Faster Restart MAY be
   implemented in CCID4 without having to wait for an explicit update to
   this document.

Regards,

Ian
-- 
Web1: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/
Web2: http://www.jandi.co.nz
Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz