[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dccp] Interest in WG adopting the I-Ds on ccid3-drops & ccid-4?
Sorry for the slow response. Yes, I believe the proposal sounds
reasonable.
Ingemar
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sally Floyd [mailto:sallyfloyd at mac.com]
> Sent: den 13 september 2007 16:28
> To: Ingemar Johansson S
> Cc: dccp at ietf.org; gorry at erg.abdn.ac.uk
> Subject: Re: [dccp] Interest in WG adopting the I-Ds on
> ccid3-drops & ccid-4?
>
> Ingemar -
>
> > I can only comment on the CCID-4 draft and I support that
> it becomes a
> > working group item esp. as it has potential to becoem
> useful for VoIP.
> > In a previous email to this group I gave an elaborate
> explanation of
> > the properties of modern speech/audio codecs and possibly I can
> > contribute with text in this direction and how CCID-4 can address
> > these issues as good as possible.
>
> CCID-4 is a fairly straightforward discussion of how TFRC-SP
> is implemented in DCCP, so I don't think that a general
> discussion of modern codecs goes in CCID-4.
>
> My inclination would be for it to go in a separate
> informational RFC with a discussion of issues with CCID-4 in
> actual use. It also makes sense to me that a "deployment
> issues" document would have a different time scale than the
> current CCID-4 specification document.
> The CCID-4 specification document needs to be done first, so
> that people can begin experimenting with CCID-4. Then a
> "deployment issues" RFC could progress more slowly, along
> with the actual use of CCID-4.
>
> Does that sound reasonable?
>
> - Sally
> http://www.icir.org/floyd/
>
> (On vacation in northern Minnesota.)
>
>