RE: [dccp] New draft :draft-ietf-dccp-serv-codes-01.txt

["Phelan, Tom" <tphelan at sonusnet.com>]

Hi Eddie,

One question on your comments:
 
> 3
> 
> => "This section explicitly updates RFC 4340 as follows:
> 
>     "A DCCP implementation MUST allow multiple applications using
>     different DCCP service codes to listen on the same server port.
> 
>     A DCCP implementation SHOULD provide a method that informs a
server
>     of the Service Code value that was selected by an active
connection."
> "
> ==> I disagree with the first requirement, the MUST.  That is too
harsh
> and I
> see no need for it.  I like the second requirement.
> 
[Tom P.] I couldn't track what Gorry and you agreed to on this in the
subsequent trail -- I assume you'd like that first requirement to be a
SHOULD instead of a MUST.  I think that's OK but I'd object to making it
a MAY or removing it.

Tom P.