[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dccp] Stockholm meeting
Hi,
> Hi Michael,
>
> Neat! I assume the idea would be to make this an experimental CCID.
> Are you considering one draft for both the algorithm and CCID, or one
> for the algorithm and one for the CCID as with TFRC?
Actually this is one of the questions I wanted to ask the
group. The latter (one each) would seem most reasonable
to me, though.
> At any rate, this effort does seem quite in line with our charter --
> I've always felt that one of the nice things about pluggable CCIDs is
> that it creates great room for experimentation.
Great!
> Even though we won't be meeting in Stockholm, if you think you can get a
> draft in time we can explore getting some time for you to present at
> tsvarea or tsvwg. Pasi, do you agree? Especially since you'll be in
> Stockholm and I won't :-).
We could definitely have a draft in time - this would be
a draft of only our mechanism, not a CCID, following the
approach of the TFRC spec, because this is an easier
first step in any case. Turning this into a CCID description
in case people don't want a standalone MulTFRC draft
shouldn't be a problem.
So, I would greatly appreciate getting some time in
tsvarea or tsvwg!
Cheers,
Michael