Datagram Congestion Control Protocol Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• RE: [dccp] Why do we have or should have keep-alive packets?, (continued)
  • RE: [dccp] Why do we have or should have keep-alive packets?, Phelan, Tom
  • Re: [dccp] Why do we have or should have keep-alive packets?, Gorry Fairhurst
  • Re: [dccp] Why do we have or should have keep-alive packets?, Colin Perkins
  • Re: [dccp] Why do we have or should have keep-alive packets?, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  • Re: [dccp] Why do we have or should have keep-alive packets?, Colin Perkins
  • RE: [dccp] Why do we have or should have keep-alive packets?, Arjuna Sathiaseelan
  • RE: [dccp] Why do we have or should have keep-alive packets?, Phelan, Tom
  • Re: [dccp] Why do we have or should have keep-alive packets?, Eddie Kohler
  • Re: [dccp] Why do we have or should have keep-alive packets?, Eddie Kohler
• [dccp] WG notes from IETF-68 for DCCP WG, Gorry Fairhurst
  • RE: [dccp] WG notes from IETF-68 for DCCP WG, Arjuna Sathiaseelan
  • [dccp] More on the slowly-responding variant of CCID2, Sally Floyd
• [dccp] Fwd: Unofficial BoF on "re-ECN architectural intent", Bob Briscoe
• [dccp] RTP over DCCP - Probing.., Arjuna Sathiaseelan
  • Re: [dccp] RTP over DCCP - Probing.., Colin Perkins
    • RE: [dccp] RTP over DCCP - Probing.., Arjuna Sathiaseelan
• [dccp] Unofficial BoF on "re-ECN architectural intent", Bob Briscoe
• [dccp] Wathig has Tagged you! :), Wathig Dawelbait
• [dccp] draft-ietf-dccp-rfc3448bis-02a.txt, Sally Floyd
• [dccp] IETF **REVISED** IETF-68 DCCP Meeting Agenda, Gorry Fairhurst
• [dccp] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dccp-rfc3448bis-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [dccp] feedback on draft-floyd-dccp-ccid4-00.txt?, Sally Floyd
  • Re: [dccp] feedback on draft-floyd-dccp-ccid4-00.txt?, Ian McDonald
    • Re: [dccp] feedback on draft-floyd-dccp-ccid4-00.txt?, Sally Floyd
      • Re: [dccp] feedback on draft-floyd-dccp-ccid4-00.txt?, Ian McDonald