Datagram Congestion Control Protocol Discussion Archive - Thread Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index] [IETF Announcements Archive]

Re: [dccp] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dccp-spec-13.txt, (continued)
- Re: [dccp] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dccp-spec-13.txt, Allison Mankin
  - Re: [dccp] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dccp-spec-13.txt, Eddie Kohler
- RE: [dccp] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dccp-spec-13.txt, Phelan, Tom
- Re: [dccp] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dccp-spec-13.txt, Allison Mankin
- Re: [dccp] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dccp-spec-13.txt, Eddie Kohler
[dccp] API for DCCP, Nenad Cuturic
- Re: [dccp] API for DCCP, Ian McDonald
  - Re: [dccp] API for DCCP, Leandro Melo de Sales
    - Re: [dccp] API for DCCP, Ian McDonald
    - Re: [dccp] API for DCCP, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [dccp] API for DCCP, Nenad Cuturic
[dccp] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dccp-spec-12.txt, Internet-Drafts
[dccp] A quick question about sequence validity windows, Xiaofeng Han
- Re: [dccp] A quick question about sequence validity windows, Eddie Kohler
  - Message not available
    - Re: [dccp] A quick question about sequence validity windows, Eddie Kohler
    - Re: [dccp] A quick question about sequence validity windows, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
[dccp] SHOULD vs. MUST in the Port Numbers section, Eddie Kohler
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [dccp] SHOULD vs. MUST in the Port Numbers section, Phelan, Tom
  - Re: [dccp] SHOULD vs. MUST in the Port Numbers section, Eddie Kohler
- RE: [dccp] SHOULD vs. MUST in the Port Numbers section, Phelan, Tom
[dccp] HEADS UP: start of WGLC for -12 of the spec, ends Dec 1, Lars Eggert
- Re: [dccp] HEADS UP: start of WGLC for -12 of the spec, ends Dec 1, Lars Eggert
- Re: [dccp] HEADS UP: start of WGLC for -12 of the spec, ends Dec 1, Lars Eggert
  - Re: [dccp] HEADS UP: start of WGLC for -12 of the spec, ends Dec 1, Lars Eggert
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [dccp] HEADS UP: start of WGLC for -12 of the spec, ends Dec 1, Phelan, Tom

Mail converted by MHonArc