Re: [dcp] a problem statement for DCP

[Jon Crowcroft <Jon.Crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk>]

one possibly useful question to ask is
whether a protocol such as PGM 
and also the ALC family of schemes,
which have been designed for 1-n
but has some of the propertiest this draft 
requests, might work quite well for n=1

(yes, i asked this question in RMT as well, but that was to 
compare RMT protocols with TCP - pgm has a specific
mode of operation , for example, where "reliability" is
downgraded if time-bounded delivery and data freshness
are a need...

In message <200202222021.g1MKLRc38185@elk.icir.org>, Sally Floyd typed:

 >>We have written a first pass of a problem statement for DCP, and
 >>submitted it to the internet-drafts directory as
 >>draft-floyd-dcp-problem-00.txt.  A local copy is available from:
 >>
 >> http://www.icir.org/floyd/papers/draft-floyd-dcp-problem-00.txt
 >>
 >>We would welcome input on the problem statement document (or on
 >>any of the technical issues related to DCP).
 >>
 >>- Sally
 >>DCP: http://www.icir.org/kohler/dcp/
 >>
 >>_______________________________________________
 >>dcp mailing list
 >>dcp@ietf.org
 >>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcp

 cheers

   jon


_______________________________________________
dcp mailing list
dcp@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcp