IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [decade] Reviews of the Decade Survey draft

Tao Ma <abcdmatao@gmail.com> Thu, 13 January 2011 01:34 UTC

Return-Path: <abcdmatao@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: decade@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: decade@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4923A67B1 for <decade@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:34:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v1-BzXFjEelu for <decade@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:34:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7BF3A6778 for <decade@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:34:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so1278847wyf.31 for <decade@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:36:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=ydu0Xx+GkgD1f9XXoqBR9F/R2WvZN5lH9PvtQe2AhLQ=; b=Ty8Yaz1MY1NiGdAWDKbyy+GZmBma26W66o7Dk2y5szSW9CE+QkHv/zck7B7EYrX1i3 mau9LLeNLBE0Zx+zhYuFOGa8NAS5fmXk58qBO4aeydl9VPhTMXFhaQ1e4OleF3dn5OsB 7ZNZWLCNdDNtY+T/oZY6CMgQeCcJoIDvRag2Q=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=FtDpoW7kPMdsDawiXZ9vuhLTw43+GRQaWy7nJM3ZWouu2GieFE0MZ4B54YU4eXf8AR DLUpYwqyTxm182Kmpnis4vwz2qjcGDavKOLURv7qzw1EwFwwBvSrc2KK4RYLWzve6OnI jopyR6EY+BhUStO6j83x0Ogd3xo9MxyP1Rey8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.16.21 with SMTP id g21mr1514749weg.6.1294882615552; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:36:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.47.12 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:36:55 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:36:55 +0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTik0e6+hihZutpGFdAqyb=G3tVSqk3AJ28YjjXrM@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tao Ma <abcdmatao@gmail.com>
To: decade@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0015176f16f6536c8b0499b05a00"
Cc: qiuxiaofeng@gmail.com, ch zhang <zhangch.bupt.001@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [decade] Reviews of the Decade Survey draft
X-BeenThere: decade@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "To start the discussion on DECoupled Application Data Enroute, to discuss the in-network data storage for p2p applications and its access protocol" <decade.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/decade>, <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/decade>
List-Post: <mailto:decade@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/decade>, <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:34:36 -0000

Hi, all
    I'd also like to add some reviews on the survey draft. I think it a very
comprehensive survey of current in-network storage system.I have some minor
comments:
    1 In section 2.2 "Historical Context", it mainly mentioned web cache and
CDN as the historical predecessor of DECADE. However, I believe "P2P cache"
should be mentioned here too, which is highlighted in problem statement
draft.
    2 As yunfei zhang has mentioned in ***
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/decade/current/msg00340.html*, I also
agree to emphasize the mobile scenarios which is not sufficiently described
in current survey draft.
    3 In the first line of secion 4.3.1, "sysem" should be "system"
    4 In section 4.5.4, "Not applicable" should be "Not provided" as the
other system described for uniform reason

Tao Ma
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, MINElab

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email