Re: [Detnet] Regarding IPR on draft-grossman-detnet-use-cases-00

Jeff Koftinoff <jeff.koftinoff@gmail.com> Tue, 03 November 2015 01:42 UTC

Return-Path: <jeff.koftinoff@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C011B2B4D for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 17:42:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eMNazGcyCMxh for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 17:42:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22a.google.com (mail-pa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6927D1B2B5B for <detnet@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 17:42:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by padec8 with SMTP id ec8so2847464pad.1 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:42:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=c9rfaWj6/h9aplL61VgSP99NvLMAn5Glzh75E8Rqe1g=; b=nv9f2641G7pIkADSuSIMdTTc5t2cwTC9dCC4QrDqkH0bKzJROmRZWvgfjwigPaQVN1 3huTm1XWcedKJSj1wlpI/IGH68mBAQap7r0Rjt8sG6zVXiCfaaDA7sd42je1dLKVhqlq RKHJT2xC0INS/E8zmOnDqUNs+AkY2J68IVZ07q3CGFk0fimJYLQHM6/5pU2Lu+8GaV1o FET7X50hTtJw2KuqSR9OS0oQk+8MMr+jPRQJpqCN9PigwirtF9IsaVrnLJ46fzBKm6ui L5Phw+bSSF0t7V41tjWG3jQgMwyzUL0KWTznVoKs0LVxon10cgR/ESJ1RJfuPygbd0Fm H/Aw==
X-Received: by 10.68.132.131 with SMTP id ou3mr30699616pbb.92.1446514965091; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:42:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [25.98.248.216] ([172.56.16.18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dd4sm26311629pbb.52.2015.11.02.17.42.43 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:42:44 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-00FFE3C6-A508-489D-99FB-5690F07D4707"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Jeff Koftinoff <jeff.koftinoff@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13B143)
In-Reply-To: <5637D455.7030807@labn.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:42:41 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <872DB3CD-17B4-4DF4-9914-77C24C49ED5C@gmail.com>
References: <5637D455.7030807@labn.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/uubpwYtZDC_RHgCGsSXVGPA5B7o>
Cc: pthubert@cisco.com, raymond.jean@hydro.qc.ca, jouni.nospam@gmail.com, Subir Das <sdas@appcomsci.com>, pwetterw@cisco.com, ethan.grossman@dolby.com, zhayiyong@huawei.comdet, yu1.kaneko@toshiba.co.jp, DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>, craig.gunther@harman.com
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Regarding IPR on draft-grossman-detnet-use-cases-00
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 01:42:47 -0000

I did contribute some use cases for Craig Gunther.

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Regards,
Jeff Koftinoff 

--jeffk++


> On Nov 2, 2015, at 13:23, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
> 
> [2nd try - sorry about the duplicate]
> 
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
> 
> As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption:
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
> 
> Please state either:
> 
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
> 
> If yes to the above, please state either:
> 
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> 
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> TO LINES.
> 
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> 
> Thank you,
> Your WG Chairs
> 
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list
> detnet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet