[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[dhcwg] Re: new issue: LL34 Better transition to routable from v4LL usingDHCP



Mika,

I agree.  However, all we can do is suggest this as useful to the
DHC WG.  I am cc:ing the dhcwg on my reply.  I don't mean to start
a long sequence of cross posts, but in this particular area it may
be a good idea.

Thanks,

Erik

Mika Liljeberg wrote:
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 15:35, Robert Elz wrote:

On the other hand, I'm not sure that I'd be happy to have a LAN
with perhaps hundreds of hosts (maybe thousands) all sending
continuous streams of broadcast packets looking for a DHCP server.
(A thousand hosts, with a 25 second (avg) delay is 40 broadcast
packets a second, which is starting to get too high - make that
5000 hosts, which is not unreasonable in some switched environments,
and you're at 200 broadcast packets a second - which is beyond
inconvenient and into extremely annoying).

Frequent polling is also a very bad idea from the standpoint of power
efficiency. Not all devices are tethered to a power outlet.

This is really a DHCP issue but it would seem preferable to have DHCP
servers announce their presence (and readines to assign addresses) with
a periodic broadcast, rather than have all the clients broadcasting in
an effort to locate a server.

A new DHCPADVERTISE message could easily be specified in a way that is
fully compatible with current DHCP usage.

Alternatively, I suppose servers could just periodically broadcast an
unsolicited DHCPOFFER, but I haven't really thought this through. There
may be reasons why this would not be a good idea.

	MikaL




_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg