I've submitted the new version of the draft to the mailing list for some days, by now, no feedback received.
I believe the questions raised in the 61th meeting have been clarified in the new draft. The main concern is the security.
In version1, we gave an example, in which user updates DNS RR in DNS server. in fact, this example have no direct relationship with the options proposed in the draft. The idea in the draft only proposes a method to configure the zone suffix. It does not concern who performs DNS update. In versioin2, we clarify this issue to avoid the misunderstanding. Moreover, after discussion, Volz and I agree to attach the "zone suffix" option with IA_PD option.
Does anyone have other opinions about that? Please give me the comments, good or bad.
Thank you!
-Yan
_______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg