On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 01:53:34AM -0700, Damien Neil wrote: > Since max-unacked-bndupd is defined in section 12.14, which does not > include the caveat from sections 7.1 and 7.2, I think that a literal > reading of the draft will conclude that this option applies to > messages and not transactions. On the other hand, I think that this There's a simpler solution: Section 6.3 should be removed. It's a rediculous idea; the benefits are negligable, and certainly don't outweigh the complexity imposed. -- David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time, Software Engineer you'll just have to do it again." Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
Attachment:
pgpuAVfKqTYBO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg