RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on "DHCP options for PANA AuthenticationAgents"

["MORAND Lionel RD-CORE-ISS" <lionel.morand at orange-ft.com>]

 Hi All,

Thanks to all for the review!

Here is a brief summary of the minor changes requested raised during the WGLCs:

Change Request#1:
Rational: duplication of text between the "Requirement language" note and the section 3 "requirements"
Proposed change: Remove one of the section
Proposed answer: the "Requirement language" is removed while the section 3 remains unchanged.

Change Request#2:
rational: In section 1 "Introduction", "manual configuration is an example of another one" is not necessary phrase in this sentence.
Proposed change: Remove from the sentence
Proposed answer: this part of the text is removed from the sentence.

Change Request#3:
Rational: In section 2 "terminology", section providing few explanations, especially for DHC folks that don't know about PANA.
Proposed change: Elaborate relevant terms described in this document in brief especially, PaC, PAA.
Proposed answer: besides references to DHCP and PANA specifications, PAA and PaC entities are explicitly introduced.

Change Request#4:
Rational: Is the section 3 "DHCP Specification Depedency" really needed?
Proposed change: Remove or elaborate any explicit aspect
Proposed answer: this section is removed as it is redundant with the section 2

Change Request#5:
Rational: in sections 5 and 6, "option-length: Length of the 'options' field in octets; Must be a multiple of four (4)"
Proposed change: "Must" should be a "MUST"
Proposed answer: "Must" is replaced by "MUST" in section 5 and 6.

All the changes will be taken into account in a new version of the draft.

Best Regards,

Lionel


> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Stig Venaas [mailto:stig.venaas at uninett.no] 
> Envoyé : vendredi 8 septembre 2006 09:29
> À : dhcwg
> Objet : Re: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on "DHCP options for 
> PANA AuthenticationAgents"
> 
> Thanks to all that responded. The draft passed wglc in both 
> dhc and pana. A new revision will be made with some changes 
> that were asked for.
> 
> Stig
> 
> Stig Venaas wrote:
> > We need more people to respond for this to pass last call, 
> there are 
> > now
> > 2 days left. Please help review the document, and let us 
> know whether 
> > you support it.
> > 
> >  From a dhc perspective we need to at least make sure that 
> the use of 
> > DHCP and the option format etc make sense.
> > 
> > Many thanks to the one person who has responded so far,
> > 
> > Stig
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg