[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dhcwg] [Question] When should we use Interface-ID option
Hideshi:
If a relay agent (which is a router) terminates a bunch of circuits, it
may well be that each of those circuits does not have their own unique
prefix (and hence a link-addess field that can be used). For example, a
relay may have one global address for all of these circuits.
In such a case, the relay must know on which circuit to relay any
replies from a server, and hence the interface-id can be used.
- Bernie
-----Original Message-----
From: Hideshi.Enokihara at jp.yokogawa.com
[mailto:Hideshi.Enokihara at jp.yokogawa.com]
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 3:43 AM
To: dhcwg at ietf.org
Subject: [dhcwg] [Question] When should we use Interface-ID option
Hi all,
I have a question regarding Interface-ID option in DHCPv6.
RFC3315 defines Interface-ID option,
but I cannot understand in what situation this option should be used.
RFC3315 20.1.1 says,
----------
(snip)
If the relay agent cannot use the address in the link-address field
to identify the interface through which the response to the client
will be relayed, the relay agent MUST include an Interface-id option
(see section 22.18)
(snip)
----------
I cannot imagine above sentence situation.
I mean that I can't think up the situation("Relay agent cannot use the
address
in the link-address field to identify the interface")
Someone, please teach me the situation that Relay agent should use
Interface-ID option in detail.
Moreover, I can't understand actual meaning of following statement.
#I feel the RFC is unclear regarding Interface-id option usage.
--------------
20.1.1. Relaying a Message from a Client
(snip)
The
relay agent fills in the link-address field as described in the
previous paragraph regardless of whether the relay agent includes an
Interface-id option in the Relay-forward message.
---------------
In this statement, when a Relay agent includes an Interface-id option,
what should the Relay agent fill in the link-address field?
What do you think?
Best Regards,
*************************************
Hideshi Enokihara
IPv6 Business
Network & Software Development Dept.
Yokogawa Electric Corporation
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg