[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [dhcwg] [Question] When should we use Interface-ID option

To: "Bernie Volz \(volz\)" <volz at cisco.com>, <Hideshi.Enokihara at jp.yokogawa.com>
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] [Question] When should we use Interface-ID option
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin at boeing.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:25:42 -0700
Cc: dhcwg at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <8E296595B6471A4689555D5D725EBB2102554EED@xmb-rtp-20a.amer.cisco.com>
List-help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcbpGwKnMFfb3hMkQl6cENdOpHP1eAHTPgCQAFuzgzAAC7F1IAACzqcA
Thread-topic: [dhcwg] [Question] When should we use Interface-ID option

I agree with Bernie that I don't see what the confusion
is here. If there is no useful information to put in the
link-address field, then there needs to be an Interface-ID
option that the relay agent can use to identify the correct
link; there's nothing more or less to it than that from
what I can tell.

Fred
fred.l.templin at boeing.com

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

References:
- RE: [dhcwg] [Question] When should we use Interface-ID option
  - From: Bernie Volz \(volz\)

Prev by Date: RE: [dhcwg] [Question] When should we use Interface-ID option
Next by Date: Re: [dhcwg] [Question] When should we use Interface-ID option
Previous by thread: RE: [dhcwg] [Question] When should we use Interface-ID option
Next by thread: Re: [dhcwg] [Question] When should we use Interface-ID option
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread