Re: [dhcwg] Bulk Leasequery for DHCPv6

[Ted Lemon <mellon at fugue.com>]

On Oct 16, 2007, at 8:37 AM, Marcus Goller wrote:
> Another option, in my opinion, would be to introduce an new status  
> code ("UnsupportedTransportLayer" or something similar) to indicate  
> to the requestor that another protocol has to be used for this  
> query type. That would also allow the DHCP server vendors to decide  
> whether to allow UDP based query types on TCP, if not ruled out by  
> your draft.

Generally speaking, doing it one way is better than doing it two  
ways.    I think using TCP for something like this makes a lot of  
sense - is there some reason why you are arguing for UDP?


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg