Re: [dhcwg] Bulk Leasequery for DHCPv6

[Mark Stapp <mjs at cisco.com>]

personally, I don't feel that the use of any of the existing queries 
over TCP has to be ruled out. it's the other orientation that could be 
... less than meaningful, so maybe that's what the new draft should forbid.

maybe I should add something like this to the next rev (depending on how 
the discussion plays out at the next meeting):

queries x, y, and z cannot be used effectively in the RFC5007 UDP 
protocol. requestors MUST NOT send queries x, y, or z to servers using 
RFC5007 leasequery.

Thanks,
Mark

Marcus Goller wrote:
>     So since any such status code is never going to be used assuming that
>     implementations comply with the spec...I'd suggest just treating a
>     UDP query with one of these types like it was garbage.  Drop and
>     (maybe) log.  No reply, no new status code.
>
>
>
> This would require to definitely rule out that UDP based query types are 
> allowed over TCP, if I understand you correctly. Maybe it is just me, 
> but this is not 100% clear to me.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg